Agreed, I don't know why I said I hope W12 doesn't suck, I use EndeavourOS now, with Windows to play games with anti-cheat. I'm sure soon devs will come up with some anti-cheat for Linux, but I think something like that requires Wayland at a minimum, X11 has too many vulnerabilities, but is still used by most distros as default.
Zozano
joined 2 years ago
Hello. Can you please automate a robot for me that will automate what I want, before I ask it, please and thank you.
Looks like Crysis has reincarnated.
Also, suggesting Windows 10 is funny as hell, the Microsoft trend of shitty alternate OS releases continues.
Hopefully Windows 12 doesn't suck.
A robot which automates what I ask it
Hey, when a banana is involved with love, there is nothing weirder, and more beautiful.
I agree the context is important, and the examples of rewriting large paragraphs justify clarification, both for new people and returning.
But the original point I made was that you don't need to post "edit: typo" here on Lemmy. We don't have edited post/comment tags, so nobody would know if it's just typos
It's really not that big of a deal anyway, I was just thinking of redundant examples of Rediquete to drum up the conversation.
I get it as a cultural thing, but it makes no sense epistemologically.
An unethical person would not state they changed their comment, and a malicious person would state their edit was mundane. Those two factors alone render the practice of proving your innocence in advance moot.
I think it's sad that people reflexively assume the worst. I used to engage in some heated debates on Reddit, but I was never accused of, or assumed the other person edited their posts to make me look bad. It seems like paranoid behaviour to me.
Strangely enough, if it became the norm to correct typos without stating it, the default assumption would be that the edit was a typo correction.
Okay I get you. I thought you were literally typing "edit: typo", as opposed to something like "edit: she was my sisters friend"
I guess we both misunderstood each other lol. I wasn't implying that was your argument, it's just something I find annoying.
That's the thing though, it's a paradox.
Anyone who is considerable enough to use "edit:" for legitimate reasons would not be the people who would be deceptive and change their posts to reflect a new opinion.
"edit: typo" is essentially just a defense against an imaginary accusation that you were being malicious.
By all means, edit posts to include extra information as an appendage, but closing with "edit: added info" is not very helpful.
Personally don't mind freemium games, I don't care about wait times and shit, just play the game at my own pace.
What I do hate is FOMO, I'm an all-or-nothin' kinda gamer. If i feel pressured to play because I might miss an exclusive item, I'm out.