ZC3rr0r

joined 2 years ago
[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Not here to comment on whether you are right (because you are) but more to report the whiplash of realising 20 years ago is still in the 2000s. Mentally, 20 years ago puts something early nineties to me.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks, that does actually help out of into context and explains how we got here. I think the better question (and the one I should've asked) is why are we still using a system that predates the railroad?

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As much as I hate to pin hopes on a hail mary like that, this is likely the only scenario where we will get voting reform to happen. The party in power has no incentive to change the system that brought them to power in the first place, so we're basically gambling on an outgoing party using their last days of holding onto power to make it happen. Just writing this out makes me wonder how we ever got here in the first place. Who thought first-past-the-post was anywhere near a functional system to begin with?

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It's certainly a bit leading in question 1 and doesn't explain the differences in question 2. I don't think it was outright intended to influence people's decisions, but it sure didn't help either.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Couldn't agree more. Politics (and politicians by extension) should represent the constituents, not force the constituents to fit into one of two camps. The whole system is backwards currently and the sooner we fix it, the better we'll all be for it.

What boggles my mind though is that three consecutive pollings on electoral reform have failed here in BC (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/electoral-reform-referendum-results-1.4954538). You'd think people would like to get rid of FPTP but apparently they consistently vote in favor of the status quo.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's almost like a system that awards power on a winner-takes-all basis results in suboptimal representation of your population. Who would've though? /s

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Personally, I think the first golden age ended with the decline of the shareware model that was used by many of the classics in the nineties.

Sure, it wasn't the decline of shareware that ended it, but de decline of the model went hand in hand with the rising cost of development and longer development timeframes that ended the games boom of the nineties.

That's my take at least. Might just be an old man with rose tinted (shareware) glasses.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That's exciting - I'll be keeping a close eye on this as it's likely what will make me switch to Linux for gaming in the near future.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

HORI has been around for a good whole, and they make what are arguably the best aftermarket Nintendo switch controllers.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

The horror is in the fact that the system forces these kinds of choices on people. Any system that forces people to consider suicide to avoid bankrupting their loved ones due to medical cost is barbaric.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

True, but Göteborg has its own areas to avoid. Hjällbo comes to mind...

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks! Sounds like decent progress hady been made in this area already. I'll keep an eye on this project so that when 24H2 drops I've got a way to avoid turning my headset into e-waste.

view more: ‹ prev next ›