YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH

joined 2 years ago
[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

No. You can publish it if you like. This is how journalists work. You cannot get someone to commit a crime towards getting classified documents (Assange tried to teach people to hack shit and pled guilty to this). But accepting them and publishing them is fine and good.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Isn’t this one of the dipshits that said that Russia would steam roll Ukraine in a week?

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 3 points 2 years ago (11 children)

I doubt thinktankers and academics are millionaires.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I would literally vote for a piece of fly encrusted dog shit than a fucking fascist.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This machine kills fascists.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 31 points 2 years ago

You can drop the “supporting” part of the fascist supporting assholes.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is cruel

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 72 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yes, because a court that found immunity in the constitution where there is none will give one flying fuck about a statute.

Do something real like campaign on adding non corrupt justices.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 52 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Real “League of National German Jews” vibes.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 6 points 2 years ago

Eh, I would just seal team the six and appoint people who aren’t lunatics right away. I would have done it on day one of having the power

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 4 points 2 years ago

We don’t have to tell the billionaires this

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 131 points 2 years ago (5 children)

This is extremely compelling. Let’s get the world’s billionaires and the six conservatives on the US Supreme Court to investigate it in an amateur built submarine. Rich people love the titanic and lack of regulations.

view more: ‹ prev next ›