WilloftheWest

joined 2 years ago
[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

Just an observation from a mathematician: I’ve never heard this comment from someone who was competent in high school maths. Whenever I mention that I’m a mathematician and someone responds how they “never got on” with maths, usually the next thing to leave their mouth is some gripe about financial literacy.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

12 years later is “shortly after”?

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 15 points 1 month ago

The punchline is ANAL.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Same thing happened to me. Still pissed off

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You’re thinking of Arthur Jermyn. Innsmouth is the fish people that the neighbouring town thought was simply a product of spending so much time fraternising with the Chinese.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like we have the same reading of that statement, and I would say a very similar reading applies to “you’re responsible for getting yourself off.” My issue is with people misappropriating the message to assert that it’s somehow okay to be apathetic to your partner’s needs.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That just sounds like a refinement of “you’re responsible for your own happiness”, which is a maxim of selfish people abusing therapy talk to justify their apathy/callousness towards their partners.

Partnerships are collaborative efforts for mutual gain, not zero-sum games where we’re individually responsible for maximising our own output from the system. A good partner should actively want to see their partner happy and fulfilled.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 50 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bravo to the exceptional bravery on display here. I'm sure the majority of PhD graduates, including myself, wish they'd had the gumption to name and shame the suppressing factors contributing to a toxic academic environment. Reading this makes me kind of appreciative that my troubles were only administrative mismanagement and an inexperienced supervisor.

Also what the hell is up with TU Delft? It's only partway through March and this is the second time this year that I've seen a PhD candidate publicly call out the institute.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

If you’re able to do so, try exercise. That was my problem: too much energy to sleep, too tired to expend energy due to poor sleep.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m married and we just have the towel.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 10 points 5 months ago

Baroque: possessing a marvellous proof, which the margin of your book is too narrow to contain.

 

I like the “facts and logic” crowd having their arguments torn down with actual facts and logic. I don’t like cutaway gags, ridiculous hyperbole delivered in an exasperated tone, shoehorned Obama worship coated in an “I’m not saying he was perfect” disclaimer, or recurring meta-gags. This cuts out most snark podcasts which, unfortunately, make up a lot of the most popular podcasts tackling right wing pundits.

Ideally, I want an introduction to the right-wing narrative of the week, and a firm put-down delivered in a documentary fashion. I don’t want hosts who I can see 2 nights a week at Second City or hear on half a dozen other podcasts.

Any suggestions welcome.

 

I’m just about to start my second full playthrough, and have run through Act I multiple times. Rather than choosing my main three companions and leaving everyone else in camp, I’m wanting to juggle companions. There are three main reasons for this: advancing everyone in the group and keeping them geared; giving each character a chance for their unique personal interactions; and trying to max out all opinion sliders. For an example: Lae’zel offers unique interaction with Kithrak Voss.

I’m hoping we can compile a list of best party compositions for roleplay potential in certain areas. I’ll start us off with all that I can think up from above ground Act I.

—-

Party Pairings: Wyll and Karlach pair well. Lae’zel and Shadowheart clash. Astarion generally clashes with any companion with a modicum of decency.

Grove:

  • Recommended party composition: Shadowheart, Wyll, and Gale for kind interactions, Lae’zel and Astarion for mean/underganded interactions.
  • Lae’zel is necessary for an interaction with Zorru.
  • Be mean to Zorru to get night 1 romance with Lae’zel.
  • Keep Wyll out of your party if you intend to free Sazza.
  • Keep Astarion and Lae’zel out of the party if you intend on being kind to tieflings.
  • Take S/W/G if you intend on saving Arabelle

Risen Road:

  • Recommended party composition: Wyll, Karlach, anyone with high Wisdom.
  • Karlach and Wyll are a good duo for confronting the paladins of Tyr. This is a personal quest for Karlach.
  • For the gnoll fight, a character with high Wisdom is useful in persuading the flind to fight for you and then kill itself.

Waukeen’s Rest:

  • Recommended party composition: Wyll, any other two (I just go Lae’zel and Karlach).
  • Wyll has a personal interaction regarding the kidnapping of Duke Ravengard.

Mountain Crossing:

  • Recommended party composition: Lae’zel, any other two (Wyll and Karlach for me).
  • Lae’zel has a unique interaction with Kithrak Voss.

Blighted Village:

  • Recommended party composition: Gale, Astarion (if he has snuck out of camp), any other.
  • Astarion has something to say about the boar drained of blood.
  • Gale is intrigued by the Thayan necromancer and the book of necromancy. Consider giving this to him.

Goblin village:

  • Recommended party composition: Shadowheart, Astarion, anyone else NOT including Wyll.
  • Shadowheart has unique remarks about the repurposed temple of Selune.
  • Shadowheart and Astarion have a good time watching you bask in Loviatar’s love.
  • Wyll struggles to keep his fat mouth shut. Keep the liability in camp.

Teahouse:

  • Recommended party composition: sneaky people or people with Hold Person (if you intend on minimising casualties), someone with create water for cheese.
  • I just always fight the hag. +1 to any stat is useless as only even stats count, and you should be shuffling the “standard” ability array to get all even stats (including two 16s). The Hag Eye is also a liability as perception is rolled more often than intimidate.
  • Sneak and cast Hold Person if you don’t want to fight any of the masked people.
  • cast Create Water on Myrina’s cage to protect her. You can usually tell her and Ethel apart through use of Examine, but Create Water results in Mayrina being wet, which doesn’t require examine to discern.
 

Just a vibe check of the Lemmy community with a deliberately exaggerated meme.

A reddit post would get flooded with argumentative mini-essays from folks who can’t string together 5 words in-character.

view more: next ›