WhyEssEff

joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

olimar-point pikmin-carry-llet-em-cookpikmin-carry-r pikmin-onion
FWIIII ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

olimar-point pikmin-carry-lnegationbidirectional-arrowpikmin-carry-r pikmin-onion
FWIIII ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

olimar-point pikmin-carry-lup-arrowright-arrowdown-arrowleft-arrowpikmin-carry-r pikmin-onion
FWIIII ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^ ^Huh!^ ^Hooh!^

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

one of my high school friends is into debatejak (his political views are insufferable and I like getting stuff over on him)

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

debatejak quote tweeting TrueAnon calling him a golem of ultramodern horrors, accusing Mehmet the podcast intern of virtue signalling

yes sir, keep posting through it. you have to trust me. the best way to show that you did well and aren't insecure about people thinking you lost a debate and being called mister rigatoni is to post for two days straight about it. the next post will exonerate you. you have to keep going

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

four off from being a dozen squared

my brother-in-YHVH you cannot pull that word game here

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the qualitative chasm between people on the side of the population having war crimes done to them saying 'international law is meaningless' and the people on the side of the war criminals saying 'international law is meaningless' is fucking oceanic. Like, is this your fucking own? Is this your bit? 'you cannot do shit to us, fuck all of you, we'll keep killing, we have nukes' is real fucking convincing. A publicly untenable position. You do not come out of a debate where you put that in the record a winner, any wins you have copped from that become pyrrhic and turn all your weaselly rhetorical dancing into ash. A genuinely psychotic ideology where you think that's acceptable to say in a medium where you are trying to convince people.

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

yeah Destiny has the excuse of arrogant ignorance typical of an amerikkkan, though in the 99th percentile of such chauvinistic bullshit. Benny Morris is an accredited historian whose own work contradicts his worldview, an unrepentant Zionist ghoul who is aware and complicit.

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I scripted it. The menial part was getting the excerpts and coding it. Here's the python code.

import os
import re
import random


def debate(file_path):
    finkelsteinisms = {
        "Borelli",
        "Barelli",
        "Morelli",
        "Berelli",
        "Borrell",
        "Farelli",
    }

    absurdisms = {
        "Versace",
        "Bumblebee",
        "Bartholomew",
        "Penalty",
        "Bigamy",
        "Beetlejuice",
        "Basketball",
        "Beelzebub",
        "Botulism",
        "Botany",
        "Fealty",
        "Weaselly",
        "Bitchass",
        "Bonelli",
        "Wikipedia",
        "Zestily"
    }

    def process_content(content):
        sections = content.strip().split("\n\n")
        processed_sections = []

        for section in sections:
            lines = section.strip().split("\n")
            processed_lines = []
            first_timecode_found = False

            for line in lines:
                match = re.match(
                    r"(\w+ \w+)? ?\((\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2})\)\s*(.*)", line.strip()
                )
                if match:
                    speaker, timecode, message = match.groups()
                    if speaker:
                        if "Bonnell" in speaker and random.randint(1, 4) == 1:
                            if random.randint(1, 4) == 1:
                                mister_x = random.choice(list(absurdisms))
                            else:    
                                mister_x = random.choice(list(finkelsteinisms))
                            speaker = speaker.replace("Bonnell", mister_x)
                        if not first_timecode_found:
                            processed_line = f"`({timecode})`  \n**{speaker}**  \n{message.strip()}\n"
                            first_timecode_found = True
                        else:
                            processed_line = f"**{speaker}**  \n{message.strip()}\n"
                    else:
                        processed_line = f"\n{message.strip()}\n"
                    processed_lines.append(processed_line)
                else:
                    processed_lines.append(line)

            processed_section = "\n".join(processed_lines)
            processed_sections.append(processed_section)

        return "\n_______________\n\n".join(processed_sections)

    dir_name, base_name = os.path.split(file_path)
    name_part = os.path.splitext(base_name)[0]
    new_file = os.path.join(dir_name, f"{name_part}_updated.md")

    with open(file_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file:
        content = file.read()

    formatted_content = process_content(content)

    with open(new_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as file:
        file.write(formatted_content)

Here's what it looked like preprocess pretty much:

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have a high school friend who's into Destiny and his political opinions are the most annoying "I'm going to take the side of whatever the status quo is so I don't have to feel the stress of arguing for anything without a base of power behind it"-shit most of the time so I'm supernaturally compulsed to dunk on him when his debate daddy wanders into territory I can actually critique coherently. Basically I rationalized my reading of it as a public service, thanks anyways rat-salute-2

view more: ‹ prev next ›