Whirlybird

joined 2 years ago
[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This would just pave the way to rampant game sharing/loss of sales though. 1 person buys a physical copy of a game and then just loans the install disks to 20 friends who all install it too for free.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago (9 children)

What software aren’t you able to access anymore that you’ve paid for? On PlayStation and Xbox at least even if stuff gets de-listed you can still redownload if you bought it. Same with physical disks

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago

Does it count as tracking though? What private or personal data is it? I’d also say that it’s at the very least grey area since all they’re doing is trying to prevent people from using their service in unintended ways, ie without ads.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Their obvious solution to this is make you consent to it or you can’t use YouTube.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Not when the features only come to apps on pixels and nothing else.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What do you think about this latest release?

Like the last few releases, it’s mostly a nothing release since Google put all their effort into pixel exclusive features now. I absolutely detest the current UI and how locked down the whole thing is becoming.

Do you think things are going in the right direction

Definitely not. Google are trying to make the pixels into iPhones, and they’re basically ignoring AOSP.

Is there anything you’d like to see prioritized in future releases

Customisation, especially of the UI. Let us change the size of the quick settings tiles for example so we can make them smaller like they used to be to have more of them.

Which device are you on?

I use an iPhone as my daily phone but I have a S21 Ultra and a Pixel 6 Pro that I use too.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

So do you want to support the artist or not?

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Obviously it’s different for unsigned artists who have self published, thought that was pretty self explanatory since they don’t have a record label/publisher/etc that takes the bulk of the money.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 6 points 2 years ago

Also important to know that Spotify is a net positive for artists, even though they pay not much. The music industry is one of the very few where being “paid in exposure” actually is a valid thing. Spotify gets your music out there in front of tens/hundreds of millions of people that would usually never ever hear your music, and you’ll convert some of them to fans that will see you live in shows and buy merch. Artists make no money on cd sales either, that all goes to the labels/publishers/producers/etc.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago

That’s your right, but by not being on Spotify you’re likely worse off. I’ve discovered many bands on Spotify that I’ve then seen live and bought merch that I’d never have heard of otherwise. It’s one of the rare times where being paid in exposure actually works.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -4 points 2 years ago

You should still support services that you use though. Pirate music if you want, but if you use Spotify you should pay for it.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Even buying the cd only puts a few bucks at best in the artists pockets. 80%+ goes to the publisher/producer/marketing/etc.

If you want to support an artist go see them live and/or buy merch from them directly. Anything what is just supporting publishers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›