Thank you. I saw it and immediately went to Miles Axelrod.
Whattrees
joined 2 years ago
This isn't ground news, it is MBFC. They don't use AI for their ratings, and they aren't vc funded. Literally both of those are next to each other on their about page if you cared to look.
Once again, the bot is giving you free information about the media source in the bot with more info linked on their site for free. You are free to ignore or block it. I just don't understand throwing a fit about the existence of a bot designed to help users understand media bias for free.
If the mere existence of free and helpful information makes you so upset, just block it and walk away.
Media Bias Fact Check, the source for the info the bot gives is not ground news. It's one of ground news' sources. They are not connected in any meaningful sense.
Also, it's not an ad, it gives you all the information right in the bot for free and links to the site with more info for free. They aren't encouraging you or even suggesting donating to or buying ground news or mbfc.
Lastly, just block the account if you don't want to see it. I have no idea why people are so upset at a bot for giving them free, helpful information they can choose to ignore or block.
... How? I've had those prongs fail on almost every cord I own.
I got mine for a hyper-specific food allergy issue years ago. We still use it occasionally. It is tremendously powerful in how you can dial in a specific cook temp that allows for more tender meat than most other preparation methods, but it also involves a bit more setup and teardown than I like for most simple after-work style meals. I would recommend it if you have things in mind already and expect to get good use out of it.
Roe, Chevron, brides, immunity, there are just too many to pick from!
You're not dog whistling, you're just certain that something fishy is going on when one athlete is bigger and stronger than another. You clearly are trying to imply something, why not just woman-up and say it?
The people whose job it is to decide already did and she qualified. What more is there to do, unless you think they need to look at it again because they got it wrong?
Yes, you totally have no opinion on it whatsoever which is why you vague-posted a "just asking questions" type comment on here.
No, she won and now they think she could only win because she's secretly a man somehow.
Boxer from Algeria beat an Italian boxer in something like 46 seconds.
Algerian girl had been previously banned from a boxing event after some "confidential" test determined she didn't qualify. Later,the boxing group said she had XY chromosomes but no solid evidence. Olympics tested her and she passed. She was born a girl and always lived as a girl, being trans is illegal in her country.
The right is insisting she is trans because of either the XY thing or a claim that she has high T levels (I don't think this has been confirmed). Suddenly they are acting like her genitals don't matter and she is a male anyway even without any evidence (at best she would be intersex from the chromosomes but not trans).
It does come pre-installed on some computers depending on the provided OS and the changes made by the manufacturer. If you install your own fresh version of windows, it should only be installed if windows believes you need it for the component to function.
My last pre-built came with a bunch of garbage before I wiped it with a fresh copy of windows and almost all went away. I would certainly not say Intel is the worst though, older dell machines and even relatively modern HP machines come with a bunch of "necessarily for the component to function" garbage that can't really be uninstalled easily (windows will reinstall them).
It's both because there is more than one kind of road.
America really likes stroads which give the impression that you can safely travel at speeds that are actually dangerous. We do that often in neighborhoods where we should be going 20-25 max but the design of the roads encourages us to drive faster. Since the speed limit is often actually at a safe speed, the issue of speeding is about the design of the road and not the speed limit.
Larger roads like highways, freeways, and expressways are designed for high-speed travel but often have speed limits that are low for the sake of revenue generation. If you've ever driven through a small town where the highway design doesn't change but the speed suddenly drops from 65 to 35 you know what I mean. In those cases the problem is with the arbitrarily low speed limit as some states have raised the cap up to 80 and have not seen a substantial increase in accident-related injuries and deaths.
Connector roads often suffer from one or the other problem listed above. They are either designed to make you feel like you can go 60 when you should be going 40 or are set at 30 when you could safely go 40. The road design needs to match the safe speed by making drivers feel unsafe when they exceed that speed and not unnecessarily penalize them by not putting the limit lower than that speed.
Both of those result in speeding but have different causes.
A bicon