WelcometoCigarCity

joined 2 years ago
[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I think hitting 1000 yards as a receiver is milestone I believe 25% of the teams last year didn't have a 1000 yd receiver.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Despite being known for being injured Evans is actually relatively healthy for most of his career. His injuries usually is something minor like hamstring. I think he can be as productive up until he's 35.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Mike Evans is a hall of famer. He'll also tie Tyreek for the most in the NFL. If he can get his yards up I think he can make 2nd Team All-Pro.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The Glazers would be considered top owners by this definition. Two SB to their albeit having one of the worst win % in that span.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Injury report correct? I swore a few more players werent going to play.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Kicking your kids out after 18 is American culture.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Our OLs rush blocking never has been great after Doug Martin’s prime years pre-2016.

By then we had always talent (or potential talent) on our wide receivers and weve never really focused on running the ball. We only ran to set up play action which worked when we won the Superbowl in 2020.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Texans and Baker both in better position than Deshaun lmao

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Hey OP do you have the stat for 3rd down conversion on defense?

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Bowles with the bend but dont break defense.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

This shit is hard to read you should use graphs.

[–] WelcometoCigarCity@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Fans really costing Moke Evans, first it was Bradys 600 th TD ball and now this touchdown drop.

view more: next ›