WarlordSdocy

joined 2 months ago
[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 weeks ago

Gotta love Dems trying to be bipartisan on stuff like this, meanwhile now that Trump is in power he's denying grants to counties and cities unless they follow his anti dei executive orders.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

The problem is the US isn't setup for third parties to really work, all this is going to do is most likely be a spoiler vote from Republicans and give more wins to Democrats. Maybe if they're lucky they'll win a few seats in uncompetitive districts.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

No I think it's one of the representatives that voted against his bill.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean it's usually the power utility telling you to do that and they're the ones making deals with the data centers so I think the criticism is fairly directed.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

100% agree but companies are of course against it because hiring people is expensive. Since if you have two people working 3 day work weeks they'll still need to be paid the same amount as working 5 days since they still need to make enough to make a living. It also gives benefits to people working since it means you can go on vacation without a bunch of work piling up since you're the only person who can do it.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep but of course companies don't care about it right now as right now it allows them to be more profitable in the immediate term.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I feel like AI is just going to end up replacing interns or entry level people, it can do easy tasks that would take a while by hand to do. Which based on how bad the job market seems to have been for people like me just trying to enter it somewhat makes sense.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem comes when those technological innovations increase productivity which companies use solely to increase their bottom line. These innovations should be benefitting workers directly.

Outside of that a lot of your argument rests on the idea that there will always be new better jobs for humans to move into. However even the examples you gave aren't great. How is someone doing manufacturing or transportation or extinguishing the street lights going to suddenly become a computer programmer? Especially considering how atleast in the US you'd have to pay to go to college to do that. And even then we've started to see in recent years a lot of these new "high demand" jobs getting saturated. As time goes on and companies use productivity gains to purely to benefit their profits they're gonna lay off more people and new jobs from new technologies aren't going to be able to keep up.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think the argument would be that the productivity gains that have happened since the 5 day work week was implemented means that if we want that same level of productivity then a 3 day work week would get that. It would be less productive then currently but the argument would be that a lot of that productivity is just going towards the profits of the companies through having to hire less people. Instead if you wanted to maintain current productivity with a 3 day work week you'd have to hire more people which is good with the amount of wealth transfer and inequality that's been happening.

Edit: not to mention how bad the job market has been recently as well.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

I think especially in New York going after landlords, both housing and commercial, would do a great job at making it so smaller businesses (which New York has a ton of) don't have to raise prices and to make it so the minimum wage doesn't have to be as high. That's why I think his rent freeze policy and whatever else he is going to do against land lords will help a lot.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that's fair, there definitely is room for improvement but atleast bus wise when I need to go somewhere in Portland I can take the bus or Max and get there. There definitely needs to be safety improvements and better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians but transit wise it's pretty accessible. The main problem that does need improving is increasing frequency and the hours that transit runs. However route wise it's only once you leave Portland and go out into the wider metro area that the bus network starts to become very lacking.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These people have to be people living out in the suburbs of Portland. Out there sure you need a car but if you're in Portland proper most places have good transit access and are fairly walkable. I say this as someone who lives outside Portland proper but still in the Metro area who drives/bikes out here but when going into the city I generally take transit and walk.

view more: next ›