VinesNFluff

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Artists" "Independent"

Corpos want artists to die, so does everyone defending AI """"""""""art""""""""""""

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So you claim, yet in defending AI art, this is what you defend.

The death of human expression. The surrendering of all things to industrialists that never cared about art ever.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The future should stamp down millions of humans, this is an entirely normal and healthy thing to want, artists are useless and always have been, isn't it great how we can now automatically steal their work? In fact human expression should be outlawed! Surrender before the great and powerful machine and never ever question the ethics of unethical things! Go get a real job like staring at an excel sheet for 8 hours a day, and never question capitalism either!

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No you're just asking a robot to make shit for you. That is not expression, that is, at best, a more modern version of grabbing shit off google images and calling it "expression"

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago

These are not the same thing and you know it, despite your gaslighting.

People using technology to express themselves is not the same as asking a fully automated plagiarism device to create shit by copying other shit.

It never will be.

The human input is where we go from 'reproduction' to 'art', and is why photography counts as art despite just capturing real things, because a human is behind it. Sets what's on camera. Expression.

AI "Art" is not expression and never will be. It's just tracing with extra steps.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

AI Art is not expression, it's plagiarism.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's FUNNY that an AI white knight thinks he is standing against Corpos when he is towing the line of exactly what corpos want.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 11 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Yes yes we should all give up on human expression and let machines do everything. AI art is great and totally not an unethical monstrosity generated on plagiarism of people's actual efforts.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Open-sourcing fully automated plagiarism does not make it less of a soulless abomination.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

"I am an artist, here is why art should die and be replaced with soulless automated reproductions"

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Man a lot of people white-knighting for fully-automated plagiarism here.

I thought the fediverse would be better than your average birdsite thread, but no, it's full of shills.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Real-time Strategy. Specifically single-player campaign oriented RTS.

Genre peaked at, like, Red Alert 3 or Starcraft II, either-or. And the only notable title in the past (N) years has been like... Age of Empires 4. Which is good but also... It's AoE. It'll always be more of a multiplayer oriented game yanno? Give me my cheesy campaign stories with cool hero units and/or cheesy FMV uwu

view more: ‹ prev next ›