Vespair

joined 2 years ago
[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

And was probably said by various people before that too, whatever. The point is this is an obvious derivative.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Honestly no joke, I do hope the future is one where we eschew all this needless religiously-borne body shame. We are the only animal on the planet that feels the need to be ashamed of our genitalia. That's weird. And I think it's weird as hell that for the vast majority of us, we have no idea what like 20% of the bodies of our very closest friends and relatives look like. That's crazy to me - I don't know what 20% of my very best friend actually looks like.

So yeah, I desperately hope humanity in the future has figured out how get past this unnecessary shame.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

My friend, we cannot even prove that our entire life is real.

We know the human mind is capable of extreme delusion, we can observe this in mentally unwell patients who are convinced their delusions are reality.

So if we acknowledge the human mind is capable of delusion, delusion so strong to be certain in its veracity, then there is no way that we can confidentially conclude that anything and everything we know isn't delusion.

So in short, there is no way to definitively prove the internet is real because we can't even definitely prove that reality is real.

I could be laying in my crib right now having imagine this and every interacting leading up to it entirely, just waiting to wake up. Literally every single thing I think I know could actually fully and completely not exist. The only thing I can be certain of in all reality is that I exist because I am considering my reality: I think, therefore I am.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Somebody really enjoyed the success of the quicksand tweet and was hoping for an encore

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Have you considered trying to think of the vocals as another music element rather than lyrical? Like if a musician scats, can you enjoy that? And if so, can you not just consider the poor enunciation a sort of scatting and stop trying to pull words out of it?

Not saying you're right or wrong, just curious where the limits on this are

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I tried to look into this, but I couldn't figure out how any of it works.

Also my name is Violent J

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is all true, but thankfully tea exists which is both caffeinated and unlike coffee doesn't taste like somebody already digested it.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Well anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's all bean water and the sanctimony people attach to any of it is weird.

It's also funny to make a comment about French presser users judging other coffee drinkers which inherently judges the french presser.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If it helps, of the over 1050+ releases I've rated I've only ever given four albums a perfect 10/10 score. 84 9s, 239 8s, 345 7s, 253 6s, 91 5s, 41 4s, and 6 3s (don't see much point is wasting my time on anything less enjoyable than that), so while I stand by my rating I think it's worth noting that my 7s are probably comparable to a lot of people's 8s.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I had a lot of fun listening to this when it released and ultimately I rated it 7/10 aka "very good."

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For extra accuracy you should have made it a repost with tons of engagements of an original post by a different users with barely any engagements

view more: ‹ prev next ›