Vegoon

joined 2 years ago
[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Eine pflanzliche Ernährung ist keine Einschränkung aber hat das größte Potential und du kannst andere darüber aufklären. Anders als bei den Zwängen durch Infrastruktur ist das für alle möglich und kann schnell eine kritische Masse erreichen.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

https://www.bpb.de/themen/umwelt/landwirtschaft/343030/klima-und-landwirtschaft/

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago

~~Tierquäler~~ Viehwirte.

Tierindustrie, dazu zählt auch die Futtermittelwirtschaft. "Vieh" ist auch ein Begriff um das Tier zur Sache abzuwerten den ich versuche zu vermeiden.

Zwei Artikel dazu:

https://albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de/aktuell/sprache

https://albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de/aktuell/die-macht-der-sprache-richtige-wortwahl

Seit ich einen anderen Artikel, den ich nicht mehr finde, dazu gelesen habe versuche ich aufzupassen. Gelingt nicht immer.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

Selbst aktiv werden. Aber du kannst auch erstmal passiv werden und die Tierindustrie nicht weiter unterstützen.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 39 points 2 years ago

25% entstehen durch die Lebensmittelproduktion

Selbst wenn wir weltweit keine fossile Brennstoffe mehr hernehmen würden reicht das momentan um das Paris Ziel zu überschreiten. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

Mit eine pflanzlichen Ernährung geht es um die Hälfte zurück, 75% der Agrarfläche würde frei werden, man müsste keinen Regenwald abholzen, wir könnten Moore wieder vernässen. https://www.bpb.de/themen/umwelt/landwirtschaft/343030/klima-und-landwirtschaft/

Schade dass man nicht menschenwürdig Leben kann ohne Tiere zu töten. /s

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

So tell me, which group is excluded? Religious carnivores? Or is it only you starting to cry if no chicken died for your tendies?

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)

People who eat animal products are not excluded if there is none. Do you only ever eat meat and have nothing to eat if its not a dead animal?

How hard is it for you to understand that nobody is excluded for not serving what their little meatflake brain desires?

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Anecdotal evidence is irrelevant when I have already posted plenty of examples where students choose to fight and vote for a plant based cafeteria. Its very simple: everyone can eat plants, nobody needs animal based products. With a limited numbers of menus plant based food is the most inclusive. Special taste preferences can be accommodated at home.

E: https://feddit.de/comment/2695679

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago (9 children)

That is why students choose to have their campus vegan because plant based food is the most inclusive.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Many universities had students surveys and made the choice for vegan menus already.

In Cambridge the students voted for completely vegan menus https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/feb/21/cambridge-university-students-vote-for-completely-vegan-menus

In Berlin 34 canteens have only one day a week a option with meat https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/31/berlins-university-canteens-go-almost-meat-free-as-students-prioritise-climate Many others are already plant based.

It is on a steady rise due to demand of the students https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/sep/22/vegan-college-menus-on-rise-as-students-return-to-universitys

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

No, I am against the prohibition of common terms, I advocate for a stricter declaration of ingredients. "Milk" alone could be milk from any mammal, cow, goat, human. Steak could be a cut from any animal, that is why a the animal it is from is declared. Oat milk is called milk since centuries but now the industry fears competition and is publishing propaganda and pays lobbyism for restrictive laws.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Right, but ‘steak’ does mean a little more than that. It also would indicate a particular kind of cut of meat, which would generally indicate minimal connective tissue, tenderness, location, etc.

So as long as it has "steak" written on it you just care that is any animal with those properties?

Would you like ‘meat-free’ labels allowed on foods that had absolutely no muscle-tissue content, but did contain animal organ, bone, and fat content?

I want a strong indicator that a product contains any animal products. There are already many labels for plant based products but none are required by any law.

view more: ‹ prev next ›