ValueSubtracted

I would love to see someone go to a curling rink and demonstrate this this is remotely possible.

There is no reason to be pointing a finger on release.

I completely agree. There is absolutely no reason to do it, because there is no chance it will do anything.

I have said several time that I have no problem with the rule being enforced.

a slight drag will prevent over -rotation of the stone.

I really don't think so, especially the light touch that I've seen on video (which, to be fair, was Homan's throw on the women's side). Again, these things are damn heavy, and you're not going to push them around with a finger without making a visible effort.

Look, I find extending a finger to give the stone a boop after release completely baffling...but there's no chance at all that it affected the trajectory of the thing. You might as well "cheat" by blowing on it.

The brooms affect the ice in front of the rock, which changes the rock's behaviour as it moves over the swept patch. You have to exert quite a bit of force to push the rock directly.

And if it had no effect why do they do it?

Sometimes by accident, I'm sure. And probably more relevant, sometimes out of sheer laziness.

Having curled myself, I can assure you it does not...and if it did make a difference, it would almost certainly be negative, since you're giving up any semblance of control that you had on the actual throw. There's not going to be some "precision poke" that magically steers it where it needs to go. But don't take my word for it.

Does it make any difference?

"No. The double-touching that I've seen has been incidental contact, and that's fingers brushing or hand brushing on a 40-pound piece of granite," said Eugene Hritzuk, a Canadian curler based in Saskatoon who has been involved in competitive curling and coaching for more than 60 years.

"What can fingers brushing against a 40-pound piece of granite do in any event? You need the palm on your hand against that stone to do anything."

Delivering a stone entails acute skills to slide on line and on pace, he said.

Once sliding on target and at the right speed, releasing the stone and then touching it with any force would cause it to veer off its intended line and speed, Hritzuk said. "That would not be advantageous to good execution."

Canadian curling commentator John Cullen, who hosted the CBC podcast Broomgate: A Curling Scandal, said most top curlers will say that double-touching has no effect on the stone.

As well, most top curlers will double-touch at times and don't think it's a foul, he said.

"The idea that a top curler would let a rock go and then want to try to adjust it with their finger —it doesn't seem like there's any way you could get an advantage from that. It feels like it would be worse."

But as I said, the rules are the rules, and I don't think it's wrong to enforce them.

...if said billiard ball weighed 40 lbs.

A little finger poke ain't gonna do shit.

But, the rules are the rules.