UniversalMonk

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF

annndddd now he's banned. I tried to warn him! lol

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The sidebar does not mention any “Disengage” rule.

True, but that doesn't change the facts I gave you, friend. Maybe the sidebar will be updated or something. Either way, I have seen people banned for going on after the word was dropped.

Listen, I know what it's like to be piled up on. Trust me on this. For a long time, people accused me of being the most downvoted, most hated person on Lemmy (good times/glory days).

Some still think that. So I know what it's like.

Sometimes when the crowd is chasing you with pitchforks, you gotta realize that you ain't gonna win the fight and you just let it go. Doesn't mean you leave Lemmy or anything, but sometimes it's just not worth arguing about. So you move on, and find places on Lemmy that you do like, and carry on.

I was just banned from some place just yesterday because someone called me a troll who was banned from everywhere, and my exact reply was: "Nope. Still here." Boom! Banned there now for ban evasion, tho I didn't realize I had ever been banned from that comm before. lol

Meh, it is what it is. Lemmy ain't that serious.

But like I said, I ain't your boss. You do you. But if you keeping on going like this in this comm, you will def get banned from here. Maybe you care, maybe you don't. I'm just giving you my opinion.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

My fiance is Jewish (disagrees with much of what Israel is doing tho and isn't very political). She was on here to check it out, and because I was hyping up the concept of Lemmy. She def wasn't a fan.

The hate for all things Jewish scared her to death and now she questions why I'm on here so much! lol

The extremism here, tho started out for rightful intentions, is starting to lean into antisemitism in some corners of Lemmy. It's very ironic and weird watching some posters go from anti-nazi everything to anti-jewish everything. Sometimes in the same comment.

I think ALL governments are assholes, so I'm somewhat indifferent to the entire thing.

I don't know what the fuck Lemmy is turning into though. I think some just wanna watch the world burn and will jump to whatever side has the matches.

If there was some instance that banned all political talk, I'd def hang out there for most of my time on Lemmy.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Just a heads up, keeping on going after someone says "Disengage" is ban-worthy in this community. I get it. People are jumping on ya, and you wanna defend yourself. But "Disengage" means the discussion has to end. If we don't follow that guideline, most of the comments here just spiral into infinity of back and forth.

So if you don't delete your comment, good chance you can get banned here. I'm not your boss tho, so you do you. I'm only pointing it out because the rule was pointed out to me once and helped me.

I'm not defending you or any others here, just giving you some facts.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Thank you, friend!

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

There is no story. And I haven't been banned from "everywhere." Those two posters (and most of Lemmy) are mad because last year I voted third party in the US election.

Back then, many on Lemmy thought that if you didn't support the Democratic Party, then you were a russian spy working for Trump. People legit accused me of living in Russia, being paid with russian bitcoin (to post on lemmy! WTF?! lol), and trying to get Trump elected. All because I posted news articles about third parties.

Several posters tracked me, one actually wrote a program to track me and the times I posted in order to "prove" I was "russian." Didn't work tho, cuz I'm not russian and I don't live in russia. It was a wild time. lol

Even tho I created and mod several socialist and third party comms: Socialst, Anarchist, Green, etc. :

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/swp@sh.itjust.works

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/msafe

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/swp@lemmy.today

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/msafe

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/greenparty@sh.itjust.works

And I actually voted for a Socialist party. Now, third party is cool, but right before the election, oh hell no! You were a traitor if you mentioned third party. lmao.

My post history and my comment history is public both from on this instance and my former home, .world under this same username. :)

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/UniversalMonk@lemmy.world

Basically they all swore up and down that I'd disappear right after the election. And blocked me. But I didn't disappear, and since they blocked me, they don't see my posts. So they keep going on and on about how I was banned from Lemmy. lol

Now, anytime they see a poster they don't like, they like to say it's an "alt of Universal Monk" trying to worship Trump. When you ask them why I would post and create so much Socialist stuff if I was really a Trump voter, they usually then attack you and say that you are an alt of Universal Monk too.

All the while, I'm over here just posting away and doing my thing and posting my fiction writing, socialist articles and anarchy articles. :)

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I appreciate your well-balanced tone and explanation. A rare thing on Lemmy lately.

I support you. Stay strong against the serial downvoters and don't let them bully you.

I'm immune. Let's test it. Let's raise a billion dollars for me

 

Ned Kelly was an Australian outlaw, known for his defiant stand against colonial authorities in the late 19th century, culminating in his capture and execution after leading a rebellion against the police.

The Jerilderie Letter doesn't explicitly mention anarchism, but its themes align pretty good with anarchist principles.

Ned Kelly criticizes the established authority, particularly the colonial legal system, and speaks out against police brutality and the exploitation of his family, which aligns with anarchist critiques of state power and hierarchical structures.

Hs rejection of authority and advocacy for justice and equality can be seen as a precursor to some of the anti-authoritarian ideas found in anarchist thought.

 

Over 5,000 people attended the mass memorial meeting called by the Anti-Militarist League for Berg, Hanson, and Caron, the three anarchists killed in the Lexington Avenue explosion. Over 800 policemen monitored the meeting, while Berkman, Abbott, Edelsohn, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Carlo Tresca, David Sullivan and Charles Plunkett all spoke for their dead comrades.

 

Technology; Piracy in Era Of Computers

Feb. 24, 1983 - The New York Times

AFTER a number of false starts against the black market in computer software and hardware, efforts are under way to protect future computer products by making each one as distinctive as the person who uses it and thus harder to copy.

As a result, there may be gradual erosion of the difference between hardware and software and a significant change in the way ordinary users purchase and operate their computers.

Over the short run, manufacturers acknowledge privately, the battle against software pirates is already lost. Most software comes packaged on floppy disks, record-like pieces of plastic that store information. And most computers include utility programs making it possible for even a novice to make an exact electronic back-up copy of almost any commercially available program.

Thus computer owners can exchange thousands of dollars worth of software as easily as children trade bubble-gum cards.

Some mail-order houses sell pirated copies of software for half the cost of the original.

Efforts by legitimate manufacturers to encode their programs to prevent copying have merely led to an expensive cat-and mouse game, in which determined hobbyists and pirates break the codes as fast as manufacturers create them.

Manufacturers hope for better luck with the next generation of computers. Seymour Rubinstein, president of the Micropro International Corporation, a leading software house, said, ''Eventually each machine and program will have a specific identity, and they will only run together.''

In the most widely suggested plan, every computer in the country would be sold with an electronic ''serial number'' in the computer's central processing unit. The machine would compare its own number with one embossed on the software sold to the machine's owner. Users could make unlimited back-up copies but could not pass them on because neither the machine nor the software could operate unless the numbers matched.

But a problem, according to Mr. Rubenstein, arises if the computer is repaired or replaced. Users would find that their old software would not operate with the new machine. ''There are ways around that, but we're still working on it,'' said Mr. Rubenstein, who is studying copy-protection methods with a committee of the Association for Data Processing Service Organizations.

In a variation of the serial-number plan, the first use of new software would prompt a message from the computer showing the identification numbers of the program and of the machine itself. The user would make a telephone call to the manufacturer, giving his credit card number and the two serial numbers, and would receive a code to make the software function on that machine.

More radical plans envision the elimination of floppy disks, which many people already regard as an inefficient way to store information.

Instead of a disk, a computer program would be stored on a ROM, meaning ''Read Only Memory.'' This is a computer chip engraved with unalterable computer instructions. When purchased, the computer would already include chips containing popular software, such as word processing programs, spreadsheets for financial planning or graphics packages. But access to the programs would be limited to users paying the price for the key to unlock the full powers of their machine.

Some people advocate building the software into the hardware. They cite home arcade games as their model. Game cartridges are essentially ROM's that are plugged into the side of the machine. While they can be copied, doing so is difficult and expensive. Kaufman Research Manufacturing Inc., a small company in Mountain View, Calif., recently received patent approval for a ROM that will execute a program but will not disclose the full structure of the program, the prerequisite to copying. ''The only way to replicate it,'' said Marc T. Kaufman, inventor of the device, ''is to put it under an electron microscope.''

But merging hardware and software has its problems. Unlike a simple Pac-Man game, a sophisticated program cannot just be plugged into the machine. And permanently installed chips limit consumers to using the programs provided by the manufacturer of the computer.

''If this industry has learned anything in the past year,'' said Rick Magnuson, director of retail marketing for Digital Research, ''it should be that consumers like to select their own software.'' Programs embedded in the machine are also impossible to update without changing chips. Mr. Rubenstein likens the problem to ''buying a video cassette recorder with all the movies already built in.''

Fighting the software pirates means headaches for ordinary users. ''Any system of locks and preventive measures makes everyone's life more difficult,'' said Edward Currie, president of Lifeboat Associates, a New York software producer. ''The last thing a manufacturer should want to do today is traumatize his customers.''

view more: ‹ prev next ›