UniversalMonk

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Crap! I answered, but you make it sound way more mysterious, so I deleted my answer!

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Hmmm, somehow I feel that my name is probably a little easier to understand than "rumimevlevi."

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh, and I'm sorry in advance for the messages you're probably about to get once people notice I'm still on your instance. Maybe they've calmed down by now though.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh, sorry! thank you for saying that. I'll update my comment. I didn't notice the emoji! And yep, I do remember you getting beat up for the same things I was getting beat up for. But we made it, we are still here. Good on ya, friend!

As for Chad McTruth, his level of sarcasm/parody or whatever, is way way too advanced for me. I legit can never figure out who's he's making fun of. He's fucking good at what he does. I am not nearly clever enough for his kind of thinking.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Right?! They don't even give a real reason now. Just putting "Universal Monk" as the ban reason feels so lazy to me. And honestly, back before the election—when I was supposedly so controversial—nothing I said or posted even came close to the shit I see people saying on Lemmy now.

If anyone goes back and looks at my posts, where I supposedly caused all that "trouble," it’s laughable compared to the hardcore stuff people say today. Like people were legit pissed that I liked the Green Party and then the Socialist party. People ended up writing programs to track me, asking for investigations into me (still happens, someone just asked a guy to write a Lemmy program to investigate me a few days ago), noting times I posted, telling me that I would die on the war front in Russia, saying that I was trying trying to destroy Lemmy, etc.

And look at Lemmy now, baby! lol

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I just wanna point out for everyone who actually may think that, it wasn't to provoke a reaction. It was literally so I can have all my fiction in one place (decided to move my writing the piefed instance, feddit.online, now).

I didn't post anywhere or anything controversial. I posted a green party news article about trees, a socialist article about energy, and then 2 or 3 of my short fiction stories.

Edit: the double voting is my way of showing a lack of respect in this situation.

And that's very much against most comms rules. I'm not saying your point was wrong, but the way you approached it was.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes I used an alt to show disrespect to someone who was hostile.

I'm gonna have to say BRP just based on that. The fact that you took Lemmy so seriously that you went to the trouble to use an alt just to "show disrespect to someone" is cringe. This ain't prison, man.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I say bring them back. If people don't like them, it's super easy for individual users to just instance-block.

.ee went away. Dubvee.org (which was a great place) went away just today. Lemmy is breaking down, and all this separation will just hasten the demise. There are plenty of tools for people to individually block things they don't like.

So my vote is for re-federating them! And thank you for bringing this up!

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Admiral Patrick, is shutting down their lemmy instance dubvee in part due to patterns of people assuming bad faith in online discourse.

Looks like he left early too. It was said that he was leaving July 31st, but the dubvee instance is no longer loading as of right now. It totally sucks that Lemmy ran him off. We need more like him on here!

Having said that, I feel the same way you do in your comments. People are being too mean on here lately.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Or maybe the incel stalker that created the spam, realized that he wasn't welcome on Lemmy.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I moved to peertube, but wow, it's not a super easy transition when it comes to posting stuff.

Maybe it's just me, but the UI is definitely wonky and not very intuitive. Took me a bit to figure out how to post.

I plan to really go big with posting soon, so maybe I can make the workflow faster.

 

May have been written today. The more things change, the more things stay the same!

 

Chicago, February 27, 1934

Dear Carl: Your letter of February 13 was quite a surprise and illuminating, to learn that you had arrived at the same conclusions that I had some years ago: that is, that Anarchism has not produced any organized ability in the present generation, only a few little loose, struggling groups, scattered over this vast country, that come together in “conferences” occasionally, talk to each other, then go home. Then we never hear from them again until another conference is held.

Do you call this a movement? You speak of “the movement” in your letter. Where is it? You say, “I just feel disgusted.” I have been for a long time.

Anarchists are good at showing the shortcomings of others’ organizations. But what have they done in the last fifty years, you say. Nothing to build up a movement; they are mere pipe-dreamers dreaming.

Consequently, Anarchism doesn’t appeal to the public. This busy, practical world cares nothing for fine-spun theories—they want facts, and too, they want a few examples shown.

They talk about cooperation. You state that you have been trying to get the four little excuses for papers to cooperate to get out one worthwhile publication, but you can’t succeed. . . .

Anarchism is a dead issue in American life today. Radicalism has been blotted off the map of Europe. The Vienna horror-slaughter is too shocking to realize. The worker is a mere appendage to the capitalist factory. Machinery has eliminated him. Robert Burns said: “O God, that men should be so cheap, and bread should be so dear!”

Radicalism is at a low ebb today. We are living in strange times! Despotism is on horseback, riding at high speed. The worker is helpless; he has no voice in his mode or method of life—he just floats along on the tides of ill times.

I went to work for the International Labor Defense (ILD) because I wanted to do a little something to help defend the victims of capitalism who got into trouble, and not always be talking, talking, talking. When the little work that is now being doled out [is finally doled out], what then?

As ever, fraternally, yours

Lucy E. Parsons

 

I think it’s time we start taking third parties seriously.

Not just as protest votes or long-shot statements, but as real vehicles for change.

The two-party system in this country has locked working-class people into a cycle of disappointment—every election feels like choosing the lesser evil, and meanwhile the things we actually need get pushed further out of reach.

When I voted for the Socialist Workers Party (no regrets!!), it wasn’t because I thought they’d win. It was because their platform actually reflects what I care about—jobs, housing, education, and peace.

I still love the Green Party too. Imagine if all working-class voters backed leaders like Eugene Debs, Ralph Nader, or Dr. Jill Stein.

These weren’t fringe lunatics—they were people calling for things we should already have: universal healthcare, a living wage, free public housing, and tuition-free universities.

That’s not utopia. That’s what other countries already do, while we dump billions into endless wars and police surveillance.

Meanwhile, our government lets corporations loot the planet and strip basic dignity from everyday people.

We could’ve built something by now. Something better.

Instead, we’re stuck in a system that props up fossil fuel giants, greenlights genocide, and ignores the climate clock ticking louder every year.

Voting third party isn’t throwing your vote away—it’s refusing to vote for your own oppression.

If enough of us did it together, they wouldn’t be third parties anymore. They’d be the people's party.

Yet instead of realising this, most Lemmy's still just stay mad that people like me didn't vote for the duopoly. lol

4
Pioneering Advanced Math from Behind Bars (www.scientificamerican.com)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/mathematics@sh.itjust.works
 

Great article on how people are helping prisoners solve advanced math problems in prison. Inspiring.

Math is giving meaning to many behind bars. So ya don't have to deal with paywall:

Pioneering Advanced Math from Behind Bars

Math research gives meaning to years spent in prison

By Amory Tillinghast-Raby Edited by Madhusree Mukerjee

Three years ago Christopher Havens, serving a prison sentence of more than two decades for murder, published a discovery in number theory from his cell. Havens and three co-authors showed that a significant class of fractions often maintains a regular structure after being transformed algebraically. Remarkably, Havens had no access to computers, which are typically used for such calculations. Instead, he painstakingly pieced his research together by hand.

Now, a nonprofit co-founded by Havens has developed a computational programming platform using one of the few technologies accessible in prison: highly restricted, text-only email. As this new facility offers more opportunities, more incarcerated individuals are diving into advanced mathematics to give meaning to their time behind bars.

Havens, who dropped out of high school as a sophomore, began his math journey in solitary confinement. "It brings out the worst in a lot of people," he says. "Right above you, you’ve got this fluorescent light that never shuts off, not even to sleep. You’ve got these guys screaming. You have people kicking the wall." To escape, Havens began solving math puzzles—first Sudoku, then packets of algebra problems slipped under his door. "I would get lost in it for days," he says. "I would dream about it." By the time he left solitary, Havens was deep into calculus and venturing into number theory, which he would later publish in.

However, teaching yourself mathematics in prison means getting stuck—not just on a problem, but on how to find the solution. "Imagine you don’t have a professor," says James Conway III, studying measure theory from Ohio’s death row. "You’re on your own." After being released from solitary, Havens wrote to a journal at Princeton University and the Institute for Advanced Study, asking for a mathematician to correspond with. Months later, researchers from Turin, Italy, responded. Their first question: How is a continued fraction transformed by the operation (af + b) / (cf + d)?

Continued fractions are like mathematical matryoshka dolls, one inside the next, and Havens calculated formulas for specific transformations in these fractions—handwritten on notebook pages that covered his cell. "It took over two years to do the math," Havens says.

For those incarcerated, the days of solving 21st-century problems with pen and paper might soon be numbered. The Prison Mathematics Project (PMP), co-founded by Havens, is helping others in prison study mathematics. With mentorship in topics like combinatorics and abstract algebra, the project has paired 171 incarcerated individuals in 27 states with mentors. One participant, Travis Cunningham, is preparing to submit research on mathematical physics for publication. The project has developed a system to let inmates write computer programs using the prison's text-only email system.

The PMP Console acts as a relay. Inmates email their code to the console, a cloud-based system runs the program in isolation, and the results are returned. Havens has already tested this system with Carsten Elsner, a mathematician at the University of Applied Sciences for Economics in Hannover, Germany. They are working on Zopf, a continued fraction with a specific sequence of integers. Havens and Elsner hope to prove that calculating the greatest common factor among these fractions forms a twisting pattern.

But Zopf also has a symbolic meaning. In German folklore, a nobleman escapes a swamp by lifting himself with his braid. "Zopf" translates to "braid," and the name captures Havens’s own journey. Mathematics, he says, "lifted me out of the swamp."

Although the PMP Console has potential, obstacles remain. Sending an email can cost up to 50 cents, while inmates earn just 52 cents per hour. And some prisons have rules that prevent the sending of "encoded" messages, including computer code. Securus Technologies, a major prison e-mail provider, is reviewing the possibility of incorporating the PMP Console into its education platform.

Despite challenges, the PMP is not just a tech project. It's an opportunity for prisoners to rebuild their lives through mathematics. "Until I started studying math, my life had just been chaos and destruction," Cunningham says. "When I got my first text on partial differential equations, I learned what love is."

For Havens, this transformation is the essence of justice. "Justice happens when you begin to fix what led you to prison in the first place," he says. Though some debts may never be fully paid, more and more people in prison are turning to mathematics to escape their own swamps.

view more: ‹ prev next ›