UniversalMonk

And yet, everyone keeps going there. Let’s be honest, they only did it because they thought it was what everyone wanted while the Dems were in power.

Now they’re changing it again because the leadership is shifting. Why can’t companies just make decisions based on what they actually want to do, without pandering to politics?

That could mean embracing DEI initiatives or ignoring them entirely—I’m fine with either choice. It’s the performative gestures, done just for appearances, that bother me.

I will say that the Bud Light fiasco was the most irritating to me. They literally did it just because that's the wave they thought people were going for. Soooo funny when that backfired bigtime.

And why do you think that is?

Because it's ironic that Musk is using weight loss drugs, but RFK,Jr. specifically says he want's people to stop using weight-loss drugs like this. So I thought it was interesting.

Agreed! lmao

Yep. We need term limits AND age limits for politicians.

Yes it's me, Universal Monk, posting. What gave me away? My name? My profile?

I can post wahtever I find interesting. If you don't like it, please feel free to block me and/or this community. Thanks! :)

lol

I'm not upset at all. Why would I be? I didn't vote for Harris or Trump. lol

Both are the same to me. :)

Im saying that the posted sources are crap, please supply us a proper one.

And again, not my job. Feel free to look it up yourself.

Yeah, and exactly where were they 5 years ago when bernie sanders was poised to win the nomination before every other candidate dropped out? They did everything in their power then to ensure sanders wouldn’t be nominated and they didnt care if a senile old mummy was handed the nuclear football.

Exactly! And it's why I left the Dem party forever over the Bernie thing. I love Bernie.

Well apparently the dem party disagreed with you, and that's what they pulled him and put up Kamala. And they still lost.