Ubermeisters

joined 2 years ago
[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A person made these marks, they all kind of focused towards a center line, overall. Maybe a rock hammer? Is especially obvious on the bottom third of the picture with the arcs in the patterns.

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago

Well I know I'm a million times as humble as thou art

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 11 points 2 years ago

Because the only other option, losing, means that they're losers and they can't accept that. It's not any more complicated than that.

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"But.. I've got all cyan and magenta and nowhere else tonout it"

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 5 points 2 years ago

I miss when Hollywood had original ideas

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 0 points 2 years ago

And if we're going to start talking about creators let's start talking about the people that made this site LMAO maybe it's not the best candlelight to hold this issue against..

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Oh I see that and i love it! But, my comment was concerning the primarily vertical orientation of the image, in the light of the users comment regarding making this a desktop background. Idk many people that have a vertical monitor, but I guess it's possible they ment that. And thisnimage would need to be cropped a lot to fit standard 16:9 ratio. Cropped so much, that you really wouldn't get all you want in any version.

Edit: I've added a wallpaper variant now in a main level comment

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ive noticed that the cyberpunk genre is widely misunderstood. That's likely intentional on behalf of corporations who really aren't served best by us fully embracing the cyberpunk attitude against corportations.

view more: ‹ prev next ›