UFODivebomb

joined 2 years ago
[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Oh? Please cite those statements.

Given your claim they will need to be exact same statements. "exact" your words. Not "close". Not "basically the same". Exact.

So. Go on. Do it. For 2020 and 2016. Since that is your claim.

If you cannot find the "exact" same statement then you failed.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

ExACt SaMe

Reductionist stupidity.

They propose different legislation. Thus different interests. Wow. Such challenge to prove this wrong.

Exact same, in case you're not that fast, means indistinguishable in all regards. The fact that they propose different legislation that have different effects means that statement is false. Congrats! Logic!

If you didn't want to sound dumb you should try a more nuanced position.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

reductionist stupidity

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Really? Can you cite this? The Internet was around then. Should be easy to find an equivalent quote like, say, Cheney's.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Definitely not the same. Please cite when this concern was raised in a previous election?

Any prior candidates encouraged a mob to attempt an insurrection?

Any other candidates collect classified material and refuse to hand it back?

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I take it the Texas tax payers would be footing the bill? If so then there is no risk (ha!) to Paxton to pursue this. Only political gain even if Texas loses.

Sigh... How is this criminal not in jail anyways?

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

The 2017 tax cuts Trump implemented massively increased the debt. Obviously, that was before the pandemic. Those tax cuts were stupid and directly to blame for a significant icrease in the debt. Which is the opposite of what Trump claimed would happen.

https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-did-tcja-affect-federal-budget-outlook

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

"look out for the bus!"

"There's no bus." "Some people say busses don't exist" "I've never seen a bus"

Bus arrives

"Waaaaaa. Why did you do this to me?!"

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reasonable? Not sure about reason haha. Unsurprising? Yes. Fairly in line with those fools.

I'm sure somebody in space command is sitting on a SM3 launch button like "come on... Please? Plleeeease?" But there is little reason for the US to do anything about the satellite right now.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

...

Yeah... I think they're dreaming that. So I'm personally concerned.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also: worked metal heats up. So an entire building collapsing on hot beams can get them even hotter.

https://youtu.be/tXF60MOWUeY?si=V-j7IlmmMB3LOK9l

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your statement is still false dipshit.

view more: ‹ prev next ›