How so? In particular how would you compare it to apartheid or India's old caste system?
Making big jumps in income is mostly luck based (building a company and getting funding for it), but is not inherently bound to some external property, like where you live or who your parents are.
Yeah, the post on Reddit had some insightful comments as well.
I did not think of nested objects that may be returned by an entity framework before.
More like "apolicecruser rule", lol
I also sleep on elm, JavaScript and typescript. (i.e. don't use then)
It's simply that I never heard of purescript.
In German y is not pronounced as "why", but instead as "Ypsilon". You win some you lose some I guess.
More infuriating is "e" - it's pronounced as "I" ffs! But when in a word only if it's the first letter or something. Otherwise it's pronounced as "e" as it rightfully should be!
I sometimes like reading or listening to stories of people scamming scammers. He used this exact thing to really confuse the scammer.
"Please type in double u double double u...."
"Alright, I typed in double u double u double..... It says page not found" (i.e. uuuuuu)
Kontrolliert wird doch sowieso nicht, oder hab ich das falsch verstanden? Es geht lediglich um die Kennzeichnung.
Und da finde ich es fair, dass wenn der Wald kein Schild braucht a la "nicht mit Feuerfesten Materialien gebaut", dass das Schild dann auch für die Häuser nicht mehr nötig ist. Es gibt fundamental quasi keinen Unterschied, dementsprechend sollte es auch bei der Kennzeichnung keinen Unterschied geben.
Ich finde sowieso das Problem sind die Pestizide. Die man mit entsprechenden gezüchteten Pflanzen ganz anders einsetzen. Dementsprechend wäre mMn eine Kennzeichnung, welche Pestizide zum Einsatz kamen, viel sinnvoller als eine Kennzeichnung für Gentechnik, die eh überall drin ist.
Edit: ich könnte mich auch damit anfreunden, wenn es die Schilder "mit CRISPR/CAS9 Gentechnik", "mit auf mutagenen basierender Gentechnik" und "Züchtung aus natürlichen Mutationen" zur Auswahl gibt. Ersteres sollte es nicht ohne Zweites als Pflichtkennzeichen geben.
Neat idea and solves e.g. the N+1 problem.
But doesn't that just shift the DB logic (denormalization, filtering, aggregation) into the application code?
You can like what you want.
But I would like to point out that excessive road infrastructure ones with a lot of negatives for the general population.
No they don't. They say there is a difference between Smartphones and newspapers or books.
I'd argue it's a nice thing to make the costs obvious for people who can't do multiplication.
It is absolutely possible to get to university after only finishing Hauptschule. You just need to go to BOS after finishing your apprenticeship and then you can achieve a fachgebundene Hochschulreife (maybe even allgemeine, im not sure) and attend University. Few people do it, because the desire is not there, or maybe not the tenacity to study further after already having trained for a job. Also you get Kindergeld and Bafög while studying.
This is true and criticized by PISA every time.
I think it has a lot to do with how much the parents value education. east asian immigrants are famous for how much emphasis they place on education and as a result get into university. The only thing that would help immediately (i.e. does not require behavioral change for a large portion of the population) would be to separate kids more from their families via Ganztagsschulen, to weaken this influence.