Thanks for doing the math.
36 different blocks of time, 1-12 and A to Z, right?
Not 1-12, but 0-9.
Edit: now that I've spelled it out, O/0 and 1/I/L (for uppercase/lowercase letters) may be problematic.
Turun
joined 2 years ago
"we as people" - citation needed, lol.
But I don't disagree with you. Of course we'd have to switch from kelvin to ... Was it Rankine? ... To keep everything consistent and some physics constants would have to change as well.
The advantage of the metric system is the scaling. The base value does not matter. We could measure everything in feet for all I care, but no inches or miles then! Only kilofeet, centifeet, millifeet, etc! And we need a better distinction between force and weight than "pound" and "pound-force" - seriously, whoever came up with must have had negative creativity.
I'd imagine a sedative overdose is the best way to go. First you get unconscious due to the sedative and once you don't feel anything anymore your heart stops beating.
Most people are flexible about that already. If you stay up to ten past twelve, do you say "I really need to get to bed now, I have work tomorrow" or do you say "I really need to get to bed now, I have work today"?
The same will be true for morning and evening in everyday speech, it follows your sleep schedule, which follows the sun. Just like summer can already mean July or December, depending on your longitude.
On one hand I agree with you, the way "chemicals" are used in everyday speech differs from the text book definition.
On the other hand, if we take our heads out of our asses and stop the "well actually"s I kinda have to agree with being against "chemicals" in food. Arsenic is naturally occurring, sure, but at what concentration? Radioactive uranium is a naturally occurring element, but I would hardly call nuclear fallout something natural.
Yes, but are those two points gender specific?
I have a graphical application that crashes regularly when I switch between displays with Ctrl+alt+number. Something in the winit stack does not like it.
Compilation: top row, runtime: button row.
Aus einem Kilo kann man 20 mal 50 Gramm machen, nicht 50 mal 50 Gramm
Aber die ausgerechneten Werte sind trotzdem richtig.
1000g = 300ct
75g = 22.5ct
50g = 15ct
35g = 10.5ct
The placement of the x axis says nothing about the values on the y axis. By convention it's often placed at y=0, but plenty of plots make this impossible or impractical or simply not desired.
Run an open source one. Training requires lots of knowledge and even more hardware resources/time. Fine tuned models are available for free online, there is not much use in training it yourself.
Options are
https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui
https://github.com/Mozilla-Ocho/llamafile
https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp
I recommend llavafiles, as this is the easiest option to run. The GitHub has all the stuff you need in the "quick start" section.
Though the default is a bit restricted on windows. Since the llavafiles are bundling the LLM weights with the executable and Windows has a 4GB limit on executables you're restricted to very small models. Workarounds are available though!
I was going to write a snarky comment, but instead I'll try to gain insight into your perspective.
What disabilities allow you to drive a car, but prevent you from walking, cycling or taking the bus?