Turret3857

joined 2 years ago
[–] Turret3857 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Thats what I'm trying to ask about. Is this taking the piss on the side of the state (anti-socialist) or is this taking the piss on the side of the people (anti-state)

Is it saying we cant disassemble the state, or that we won't?

[–] Turret3857 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can do that but you're risking your entire photo library being on the clearweb if a 0 day exploit is found.

[–] Turret3857 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you called a taxi company that didnt do fixed rates you should have looked into them before you called. If you consider a ride "mooching" I would not want to be your friend. If your public transit isnt good enough, call your local reps and COMPLAIN.

Fuck this culture of "tipping". I wouldnt have to fucking tip if they paid their drivers. Do you tip in cash on Uber? The driver won't know that until they get there and you just look like a low-pay customer. Do you tip in the app? Congrats, you just tipped uber. The driver may or may not receive it. Do you verify with each driver to make sure they end up getting the money? Uber has obfuscated tipping for drivers FOR YEARS.

[–] Turret3857 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And tariffs are for charging the company being imported. They never tried pushing those lost costs onto the customer

They wanted to charge per game sale. It's not "per download" but it's close enough for most consumers.

[–] Turret3857 24 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Most of the comments here seem to be talking about the politics of the gender roles, but no one really seems to be mentioning that Uber should only be used as a very last resort. Call a Taxi, a friend, take public transit. Do not support the VC startup trash that doesn't pay their ~~employees~~ "contractors" living wage.

[–] Turret3857 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

we dont as in we arent allowed to or we dont as in we dont want to?

[–] Turret3857 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Again, with the disingenuous arguments. You're shifting language here to work for you. You know damn good and well we are talking about misinformation. Why would international websites with good information be blocked?

How about you come up with something better, since you're so damn good at finding "holes" in other peoples proposals.

[–] Turret3857 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Disingenuous argument from the jump. International websites can very easily be blocked (see- the great firewall)

and acting like we've never had a nonpartisan committee to decided if things are false is wild.

[–] Turret3857 4 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

We don't live in utopia

okay so I have an idea... how about we just fucking regulate dis/misinformation and make the alphabet soup agencies do the jobs theyre supposed to be fucking doing instead of investigating Bad Bunny.

[–] Turret3857 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

do you mean vs codium or are you memeing

[–] Turret3857 5 points 3 weeks ago

If we're going by extremes maybe we can get a socialist president this time round? Actual universal healthcare?

[–] Turret3857 3 points 3 weeks ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›