TruthAintEasy

joined 1 year ago
[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You know what? Thats a strong and logical point you make there. Warefare is evolving, and like tech its going to speed up the rate of change

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 88 points 1 year ago (26 children)

I can see how people raised in stable loving families think 'why shouldnt the parents know?' But I was raised by a raging narcissist, if dad slept bad a head-punch during breakfast was not uncommon. First memory I have is being hurt by my dad...

If I were trans this would have sealed my fate; killed via 'exorcism'

If the kid doesnt want their parents to know about their gender identity well that isnt a bad kid, those are bad parents. Yes really.

Believe you me, the good parents dont need the school to tell them, they already know because a child that feels safe will just tell you. If you really love them you will already know anyways just from paying attention to them.

I know people with mental diagnosis who support this shit. Try explaining to them that they are one the list of undesirables too, or dont if you value your time and sanity.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Gun scare people. Scared people with guns fire more bullets. More gunfire scares more people, causing them to buy guns for protection. Now those additional scared people with guns use them, bringing that same fear they feel to more of their neighbours, who respond by buying guns to protect themselves...

If you really want an armed populace just make it mandatory for all citizens to complete 1 year of military service, with the people retaining their service arms at home. This way everyone is trained the same way and follows the same standards with their weapons. This takes the 'cool' factor out of owning guns, takes the identity politics out of it, and the criminals will now know that they likely cannot gain the advantage in fire power just by getting a high capacity magazine.

It would also calm the cops down, because the year of manditory service will weed out all the crazies that cant handle the responsibility of gun ownership, and since everyone went to the same program you have an automatic national database of who isnt fit for ownership. Give mental health proffessionals the ability to flag on the database when an idividual is having issues so their weapons can be TEMPORARILY removed untill their mental health is restored.

The 2a guys will also lose their main talking point: government is the one giving them the gun now, they would look stupid REEEing about 'gubberment wants muh guns!!'

It seems like the USA will never say no to guns, so why not go full ham instead of just letting every state make up its own rules as it goes along? The current system has some very obvious flaws. Freedom should not be free, it should require responsibiliy, the proof is in the never ending american gun tragedy.

Edit: accidentally tripple posted, still learning the UI... deleted the two duplicates, and fixed some bad grammar

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Better than how my city handles a merge lane... they just stop, full on stop on both the merge lane AND the left lane, if they are feeling spicey the passing lane might come to a stop too because... reasons? Best of all is when they are slowing right down to merge in light traffic but they see you coming up the left lane so they take the lane immediately and just, not speed up.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I figure since our digestive system is a hole going right down the middle of our bodies that we are wrapped around, humans are technically doughnut shaped therefore grains also count as human embryo's, lock them farmers up! /s

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

True true, learning the instrument may even be better for the brain if your older and already know where and how you intend to travel in retirement

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, it aint easy sometimes

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You sure? In the whole bible Satan kills 10 people in total, because God tells him to, and even Satan is having second thoughts about doing Job so dirty, meanwhile God makes his arrows drunk with blood.

Oh I know, my favorite old testament law: If you neighbour strives against you and is raining blows down upon you; if your wife grabs him by the genitals to delivery you from your assailant you must cut off her hand. Show no mercy. < is that the image of god you like?

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I boggles the mind, this image of god nonsense. If we are made in gods image then gods image also includes Meth addicts and sexual offenders? God must be one crazy bugger.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Just waiting for some dipshit to use AI deepfake of Biden saying "by executive order, all guns and ammunition are now illegal" with a nice sora video of the national guard kicking down doors and shooting people, followed by pictures of shuttered gun stores

Doesnt matter that he cant do that with an executive order, what matters is how gullible people are if you trigger them properly

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you mind if I ask how you percieve my username?

I seriously internally debated not using the word truth as neo-cons have tainted it but then I thought, no, if I back away from the word truth just because some people miss use it then thats just letting the baddies win.

But the truth is complicated, and often disturbing, hardly ever as simple as "orange man bad" or " Biden old". Even though both statements are 'true' neither one actually conveighs any usefull information or nuance. Orange man is also old, Biden also did some bad stuff (who hasnt?) So both statements are true in the simplified context, but in the context of making an informed decision as a voter both statements are so simple and frankly so dumb that they become invalid. Does that mean the statements are true in one context but false in a different context?

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Oh thats perfect!

view more: ‹ prev next ›