TonyTonyChopper

joined 2 years ago
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

someone commented above, it's the opposite

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 18 points 2 years ago

this picture gave me a neck injury

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

this is such a horrible take. It's not the place for "what about" comments

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago

"chaos" is a bit of an exaggeration. It was only an inchident

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

same thing with the TSA

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 35 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I do wonder whether this was actually an effective way to look for them. Even with modern high resolution x-ray imaging it may be difficult to see the contrast between soft tissues and diamonds since they're both primarily carbon

bones show up well since they're high in calcium, which has a much higher atomic number. Same with gold.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

this was one of those rogue waves right

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

credit score go 📉📉📉📉

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 8 points 2 years ago

"perchange generator" sounds like science fiction, maybe ask on a forum for this... software?

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

yes, don't fuck around with corrosive chemicals. Strong acids or bases will destroy tissues with ease, especially if they're not protected by skin (which also gets dissolved but more slowly)

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

the English versions of element names are mostly stolen from other languages anyway. Some were isolated before the theory of elements and atoms had been solidified, so they already had names in common use. All of the examples you listed for "ium" elements were only discovered in the last few hundred years

view more: ‹ prev next ›