Tolookah

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 103 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wish all my work meetings got cancelled due to scheduling conflicts.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then infrastructure week?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I recall, they want you to be on the same network your own (edit: was town) client will be. I think

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You have a small quiz, which is questions like "have you read the rules? Do you understand why you need to seed? What's your client?"

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't think it has ever been about practicality

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago

I see you have not met many CTOs, unfortunately.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It could be 10% and still be enough redactions to drive up the conspiracy meter. Just imagine if it was:

  • Tony, first name
  • Redacted
  • Twirp, first name

(I'm suggesting that there are enough higher-ups to bury it)

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

The weather is trying to immigrate without papers. We should send ice/dhs after it. In small planes and boats until they solve it.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you hide a large number of things? Maybe you found a built in limit?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

... That we fired all the cloud seeders?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There's nothing left.

But in all seriousness, there's likely too many higher up maga party people that redacting them would decimate the list, and it's alphabetical so it would be obvious.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 month ago

Damn it Seven, I know coffee is a stimulant, but it doesn't mean I want just any stimulant. Stop trying to give me cocaine, it's not "more efficient"

view more: ‹ prev next ›