ToastedPlanet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The Culture

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture

I hadn't heard of this. It seems cool. =D

What is it now?

Read what I wrote. The US used to stand for freedom and justice for all and the US no longer does.

Apart from that, you are projecting a bit much here.

Your argument is beat for beat the same argument so it's not projection.

Don’t be like them and run around with that patriotism bullshit.

Your argument agrees with the fascists in that "America was never a democracy". The fascists just take it further and say we were always a white christian nation. Stop running around with the accelerationist bullshit.

Don’t pretend that your country was so great and free and fair and all. It never was.

It got better, because the people stood up took their rights against push back, against violence and murder.

So your argument concedes it is the same accelerationist argument. Your argument even clarifies it's wrong at the same time. Cool.

but stop twisting that into what you want to make other people believe is some core value of your country and the only real patriotic thing or some shit.

I am going to keep refuting accelerationist arguments. You can try to bullshit in your argument all you want.

Fascism will fail. Accelerationism will fail. People are going to keep telling the truth.

5 8 7 2 4 1 6 3

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

No, now the US is a white nationalist, christo-fascist, techno-fedualist dictatorship. The US doesn't stand for anything. The US is now a tool for the wealthy to enrich themselves at our expense in a capacity we haven't seen since monopolies were busted.

This “freedom and justice for all” thing was always a myth.

This argument is ahistorical. The US extended rights to people of color and women.

the MAGA shitstains are the true American patriots

The fascists are still fascists. All they do is hate. They don't love this country. The nation state is only ever a vehicle to terrorize, subjugate, and kill people.

This "freedom and justice for all is a myth" argument is the same as every other "America was never a democracy" argument. This argument is made by people who do not value freedom and justice for all or democracy. America's failings are a justification to destroy the country that has personally wronged them. They feel they've been morally tainted by association with the US and their only recourse is to burn a country of 340 million people to the ground to somehow redeem themselves. Not even to make something better and in some cases instead the goal is to end up in a red fascist dictatorship.

Nothing is good enough for them, no amount of social progress matters. Like in this case where, as usual, the argument pretends social movements didn't happen. People make these arguments because they've personally been made to feel morally uncomfortable. So everyone can die as far as they care.

Don't let people get away with this. The fascists took our democracy and freedoms away. The people who pretend those weren't real don't want us to have them either.

This user's argument is more of the same accelerationism that was rampant before, during, and after the 2024 election. Accelerationism benefits the fascists and thus is not anti-fascism. Part of the way we fight back against fascists is telling the truth. edit: typo

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Mamdani is a socialist like myself. He's using the Democrat party because it's the most useful tool available to him. But he's not a neoliberal Democrat.

I'm a registered independent. I'm not this neoliberal you've concocted to debate with. I know Mamdani's got a lock on the Mayoral race as the Democratic nominee. And I don't gatekeep who is in the Democratic Party.

Lol, your argument is to refuse to vote for anyone who isn't as far left as Mamdani. You're not arguing to think globally or act locally. You're larping on the internet.

What if I told you that any genuinely Left Irish Republicanism, even from the Irish Diaspora, requires calling for a Free Palestine? We have arrived at that same human collective conclusion while allowing for Pride in our own identity to participate in cementing that.

But you'll argue against voting for candidates who aren't fascists in future election. Even if that means the fascists will continue to genocide the people you pretend to care about. No thanks.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm going to keep arguing against accelerationism.

This idea that we should only support democratic socialists like Mamdani and Bernie is ridiculous and is definitively accelerationist.

Accelerationist ideas need to be challenged and refuted wherever they show up.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

I support Mamdani. I'm going to vote for the furthest left, viable candidates that I can. In most cases, in the short term, that's going to be neoliberals. Hopefully all the candidates will be socialist eventually.

Your argument is fully committed to owning this neoliberal that you've invented. I don't care about what other people think about me. I'm way to close to the chopping block to care. So I definitely don't care about your views on this other person you're pretending to have an argument with.

But you're argument is an excellent example of how to be politically ineffective so I'll keep dismantling it. People need to out grow this mindset of preserving their personal moral purity in order to be politically effective. Instead they'll need to learn how to analyze what strategies are the most useful.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Nah, your argument is that you're a cool edge lord who rejects any association with other people if it means risking your purity.

The whole point of rejecting a national identity is to form a broader human identity. But instead of that people seem to take leftism as another kind of American libertarian individualism were the goal is to reject being apart of anything bigger than yourself.

Believing in shared ideals like freedom and justice for all means rejecting a state when it abandons those ideals.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

A neoliberal Israeli online newspaper is of course going to spin the neoliberal Democrat in a positive light. So what?

It doesn't change the fact that Kamala Harris was the right choice in 2024. Or that your argument is based on talking points from a Russian bot farm.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

The way we defeat fascism is by rallying around shared ideas and ideals. And not by being an island of one.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

You read the comment incorrectly. MAGAts are christo-fascist nationalists of course.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

There are more positions we need to vote for then just the one Mamdani ran for. Only voting for people who meet your personal purity test isn't a useful strategy.

Harris refusing to rebuke Biden? Was a critical misstep. As was allowing the party to carry on influencing Republican primaries for the same “centrist” appeal. Picking up Megan McCain and Dick fucking war criminal Cheney endorsements and refusing to alienate them was not the way to retain the Left or Youth.

Obviously. There can be more than one lesson to learn from an election.

90% of your agrument is addressed to an imaginary neoliberal. All so you can larp about being so pure for only being willing to support one guy. We need more than the mayor of the New York to defeat fascism.

I will only vote for people who offer actual material policy gains like Zohran Mamdani does, Democrat or otherwise.

 

Ever since we revealed our good friend Bolt, many of you have speculated that dual-ink cards were coming to Disney Lorcana TCG, and you were right!

 

When the first character for Disney Lorcana’s upcoming Archazia’s Island set was revealed, it sparked a debate throughout the TCG community. Lorcana’s introduction of Bolt, star of the 2008 animated film of the same name, seemed to have the visual identity of both Amber and Steel characters. Many immediately suspected what we eventually learned: Archazia’s Island will introduce dual-ink cards to the game.

 

The Disney Lorcana promotion for the new Pack Rush game mode will start on February 9th and will run from then until February 15th. These free packs will be given away in the United States and in Canada, and while only physical locations are eligible sites for the free packs, the Disney Lorcana team has shared a list on the game’s site of all the recognized stores that offer Disney Lorcana products. Unfortunately for those interested in taking part in this promotion, part of the onus is put on the player in that you must “reach out to your local organized play store to see if they are participating.”

https://www.disneylorcana.com/en-US/news_/2025_/02_/valentine-pack-rush

23
Rulefishing (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 

I received this scam message today! I'm not even the first person to receive this scam and then make a post about it!

blobcat, bug

[redacted]

Hi, I’m Nicole! But you can call me the Fediverse Chick :D

I’m a proud Polish girl from Toronto (29 y/o)

I’m currently taking the pre-health sciences program at Toronto Metropolitan University hoping to get into the medical field someday!

You can add me on Friendica: [redacted]

Watch me stream on Peertube: [redacted]

 

In lieu of the typical months-long spoiler season for the upcoming set, Ravensburger has instead revealed the next three sets early. At last month’s European Continental Championship we learned about Archazia’s Island and the set that follows it in June, Reign of Jafar, and this week at London Toy Fair we learned the name of the Q3 2025 set: Fabled.

Why give us so many details about this year’s upcoming sets rather than focus on March’s Archazia’s Island? Why this sudden change in reveal strategy? Well, without any new cards to overanalyze, let’s dive way too deep into my wild theory about what these three upcoming expansions are setting up.

 
  • Ravensburger reveals Disney Lorcana Sets 7, 8, and 9 at London Toy Fair.
  • Set 7, Archazia's Island, launches March 7, 2025, featuring Disney's Bolt.
  • Set 8, Reign of Jafar, releases on June 6, 2025, with pre-events on May 30.
  • Set 9, Fabled, arrives in Q3, showcasing classic characters Mickey and Minnie.
 

[Alt-text] Stella deduces she is not familiar with the contents of a book that Peach is investigating.

I saw this text during my play through and immediately thought it should go in this community. And I eventually got around to that. =)

 

Disney Lorcana is getting ready to release its seventh set, Archazia’s Island. Archazia’s Island will be the third set since Ursula’s Return and will likely continue to build on the hints from Shimmering Skies and Azurite Sea about Jafar’s nefarious plans. These plot beats are set to come to a head with the Reign of Jafar set later this year. In addition to continuing Lorcana’s ongoing narrative, Archazia’s Island is also set to introduce some exciting new Glimmers to the game, some for characters that have yet to appear in Lorcana.

Archazia’s Island will focus heavily on Disney’s pet characters, so fans of the media giant's many animal protagonists or sidekicks will likely be interested in this set. The set’s tagline, “learn new tricks,” also has players speculating that some new mechanics will be revealed in the set. Spoilers for new Lorcana cards usually come out closer to a set’s release, so anyone hungry for more information on Archazia’s Island should be paying attention to the set’s release dates to know when new reveals should be expected.

 

Though there's been no official confirmation for a video game version of Disney's Lorcana, there have been signs pointing toward its active development. LorcanaNews posted on X yesterday to share a recent job listing on Indeed that included a few interesting candidate preferences.

view more: ‹ prev next ›