Is it me or is the broadcast quality absolutely awful today? All sorts of ghosting and glitching all over the place.
Thorry84
Your mother sucks cocks in hell!
Well it's good she's keeping busy at least
Whilst I agree with the general message of this article, it does appear to be badly written. Lots of filler and repetition, focusing on unimportant details just to fill out some sort of word count. It feels like it was written heavily assisted by AI.
And the war on drugs was extremely effective and didn't cause any bad things at all!
Why do you think that? I think the new leadership is trying to bring stability to the team. Lawson is at the same performance level in the RB as Tsunoda was. The Red Bull car has a very narrow operating window and suits the driving style of Verstappen. Everyone else has a really hard time getting anything out of that car. It takes time to get close to the level of Verstappen and it's hard to get there when the car doesn't perform at all unless you are near his level.
This isn't new, we've seen cars like this in the past. I remember the Ferrari car being a handful back in the day. When Massa was injured in 2009 and had to step out for a while, nobody could drive his car. They tried Luca Badoer, who was very experienced driving the car in the simulator, but was dead slow in the real car. They then pulled in Fisichella, who did pretty well as teammate to Alonso at Renault and had a pole position and podium with Force India that year. He was nowhere in the Ferrari, I don't think he scored a single point. Whilst Raikkonen was fighting at the front regularly in the same car.
Checkmate liberals
I don't know, I feel like saying 'kagis' makes you streets ahead of the rest.
SOURCE!?!?!?!
My pussy
And my crack
Is this going to be improved with the 2026 aero?
Back in the day they would just go racing, but it did lead to some big crashes. But if the alternative is no racing at all, that's not right as well. Is there a middle ground?
Not below average dev necessarily, but when posting code examples on the internet people often try to get a point across. Like how do I solve X? Here is code that solves X perfectly, the rest of the code is total crap, ignore that and focus on the X part. Because it's just an example, it doesn't really matter. But when it's used to train an LLM it's all just code. It doesn't know which parts are important and which aren't.
And this becomes worse when small little bits of code are included in things like tutorials. That means it's copy pasted all over the place, on forums, social media, stackoverflow etc. So it's weighted way more heavily. And the part where the tutorial said: "Warning, this code is really bad and insecure, it's just an example to show this one thing" gets lost in the shuffle.
Same thing when an often used pattern when using a framework gets replaced by new code where the framework does a little bit more so the same pattern isn't needed anymore. The LLM will just continue with the old pattern, even though there's often a good reason it got replaced (for example security issues). And if the new and old version aren't compatible with each other, you are in for a world of hurt trying to use an LLM.
And now with AI slop flooding all of these places where they used to get their data, it just becomes worse and worse.
These are just some of the issues why using an LLM for coding is probably a really bad idea.
I don't know, most experimental technologies aren't allowed to be tested in public till they are good and well ready. This whole move fast break often thing seems like a REALLY bad idea for something like cars on public roads.