TheparishofChigwell

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm missing the joke here..

True.

Not an American myself, so I have to add an extra opening here

Some kids shoot up their entire class or even younger classes

We don't ask their political stance there per sé, we can also just say they went nuts and picked an easy target

I think maybe this kid just picked a really good target, and maybe he was trying to find a new group by doing what he did. Maybe it was atoning for his parents and his own beliefs.

Lots of maybe, but again; he is just a killer in the end. Why make it political

You mean dent the can and smoke the paint and plastic inner coating instead of just asking a dude for some papes

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hey now thinking doesn't work for everyone, at least they tried I guess. Try again tomorrow

My bad. Foreigner that acted on a reddit comment without checking first, feel free to point and laugh

Well consider me corrected. I made the assumption based off of reddit comments.. I deserve public lambasting for still scrolling and acting instead of researching first.

But hey if any of the Americans that believe it's true would print a similar flag I would still find it worth the shame

 

Better version

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting. I would never use more than one semicolon before ending a sentence, but breaking up list like that does seem to respect the verbalization

Lol Pokemon moves

"Foreign minister leers at president; it is super effective!"

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I, as an avid reader, have always tried to depend on semicolons; for when sentences have ended but deserve the epilogue.

Approved?

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

How do you feel about semicolons

First time I read satanyahu, good one

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are we.. serious here? You think an Android replaced Mark?

No judgement just checking

 

On reddit people are discussing the very quick cementing of this new truth, where everything can retroactively be waved off as having been AI.

People talk about the loss of certainty on everything ever since AI became a significant factor.

I disagree, it would be pandemonium if everything needs double checking and nothing is real. I think there is an obvious solution:

Make it into law that any official statement is assumed true unless it's redacted by the subject within a set amount of time.

Make it so people have an appeal window to any news outlet, with heavy consequences for platforms that do not redact.

We cannot be living in psychosis bizzarroland, and if Bibi says he's alive then take the countries word for it.

Let's say someone claims with a video that Trump is dead and replaced by a clone. Why would we allow for people to believe in that kind of nonsense which is obviously meant to divide people and turn a lot of them into crazies. If the administration would claim it's untrue, then that should be published as truth using no uncertain terms: article x was deepfakes

Anyone who claims differently afterwards is perpetuating lies and should be held accountable

view more: next ›