I was going to say "No one is saying that", but there are many going down that road.
The preferable approach is degrowth. A lower birthrate leading to a smaller population with no deaths required, just vastly fewer births and lower consumption until human civilization can not only fit with our planetary boundaries, but restore a lot of wildlife and wildlands, then stabilize at a population and consumption that is healthy and comfortable.
I tried once. I'm hardwired with compassion and a strong moral and ethical framework.
Last time I tried so hard at employee wage theft and I ended up giving my guys a bonus and the afternoon off. I'm just not cut-out for fascist oligarchy.
Fair. If you don't mind being a burden on your loves ones, that's a choice. I won't, and that's my choice.
If you can't stuff mashed potatoes in your own mouth, what are you living for?
I don't want my children or anyone elses to take care of me, or other old folks. No one should place that burden on our youth. When it's time, its time. I'm reminded of a friend who had to take leave off work because his dad was in a home and couldn't feed himself and they had insufficient staff to care for the old folks feedings and washings. What a disgusting way to live. I'll never be that burden on anyone.
I'll take care of myself and when I can't do that anymore I'll take care of myself. ಠ_ಠ
With any luck, society will learn sensible limits to eldercare.
Por qué no los dos!
Bold of you to assume I'm not a fascist oligarch. Mebbe I am?
Earth's population was meant to decline. Degrowth of a sort, because 8 billion is too many.
Why have children when their future is guarenteed to be fucked?
Just tell your campus book store that you self-identify as AI. FREE BOOKS!
Hershey makes American garbage "chocolate", their words not mine. Didn't buy it before. Won't buy it now.
Why is this shitstain being allowed in the country?
Doublespeak. Both and none.