TheSanSabaSongbird

joined 2 years ago
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I admire your optimism.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

More than one thing can be true at once. Their own gerrymandering played a huge role as well by creating hundreds of districts that are so safe that the real election is the primary, not the general, so the way you win is by always tacking to the right and being more and more performatively batshit crazy.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 5 points 2 years ago

To be fair, he had a lot of help.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)

McCarthy is selling himself short here. He deserves at least a little credit for this clusterfuck as well. All of these cowards deserve credit. After January 6 they all had the chance to stand up and do the right thing and wrest control of the GOP from Trump and the crazies, but no, they were all too scared.

While I hate her politics, I have nothing but respect for Liz Cheney.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id -1 points 2 years ago

Typical oversimplified tripe. Soviet bodies played a huge role, but US and British mechanized force projection, naval power and industrial capacity were at least as important.

It's also just bullshit that the Axis had already lost. That's the worst kind of historical revisionism. It might be obvious to us looking back, but it wasn't even remotely obvious to anyone alive then.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago

Close. What they were worried about was a hot war with the Soviets. There was also a great deal of uncertainty about Japanese willingness to continue to fight. It's simply not the case that they had clear unambiguous intelligence on Japanese leadership's intentions, which makes sense since there were several schools of thought among the Japanese.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Any respected historian on the subject will tell you that it's way more complicated and nuanced than your average social media user is aware of. If, like Truman, you honestly believed that using atomic bombs on Japan would ultimately result in less loss of life, on a purely mathematical basis it was the only moral decision.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 3 points 2 years ago

Well that and the fact that there was a huge Irish-American population that was hostile towards the UK in ways that I think a lot of younger people and non-historians have really lost sight of because it's not really a thing anymore. The idea of taking sides with the British Empire was a very tough pill for a lot of Irish-Americans, most of whom, unlike today, still had direct connections to Ireland. The famine was no longer really in living memory, but the children of the famine survivors were definitely still alive and influential and they absolutely despised the British for understandable reasons.

History is always way more complex and nuanced than some half-baked one-liner trope on social media.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 10 points 2 years ago

So in 250+ years this has never happened, but you're totally cool with it because it jives with some misconception you have about what's really going on? The real reason this is happening is that the Republicans, through gerrymandering and collective cowardice, have allowed themselves to be taken over by a crazed nihilistic extremist minority. It's not about different opinions.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Uh, no, this is not in fact how it's supposed to work. Not even close. This is why it's never happened before.

view more: ‹ prev next ›