TheSanSabaSongbird

joined 2 years ago
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 39 points 2 years ago (5 children)
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Timothy Snyder makes a pretty convincing case for it in "The Road to Unfreedom." It was published in 2018 so probably written in 2016 and 2017 at the latest, and it looks ridiculously prescient now.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This seems mostly right, but I want to add a few points.

The first is that the Ukrainians won't stop fighting if the west stops supporting them. They may suffer some severe defeats and the nature of the war may shift to being more of a guerrilla insurgency, but they won't stop fighting.

The second is that even if the US withdraws support, it's not likely that European nations will necessarily follow, and between Germany and the UK and France, the Europeans can easily continue to support Ukraine at or above current levels.

My final point is that Ukraine actually is making slow progress in pushing back the Russians, it's just not going anywhere near as fast as anyone would like.

I also really dislike the term "stalemate" because it implies a static state of affairs as in a chess game where there are only so many pieces and moves, when in fact war is much different in the sense that additional pieces and moves can and probably will be added to the equation.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 7 points 2 years ago

This is how democracies die.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 8 points 2 years ago

This is how democracies die. Fascists don't need a majority to win, they just need their opposition to be splintered. It's exactly what happened in Hungary, and now it's too late.

You might want to think long and hard about how you triage your political decisions.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 4 points 2 years ago

Maybe, but people are really good at rationalizing their decisions, so I don't know how much that even tells us.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago

The SCOTUS needs to revisit the issue. Heller was wrongly decided on the basis of shitacularly poor reasoning. There is no other solution. Unfortunately it's not going to happen any time soon. The plus side is that as Dobbs showed us, the court has no problem overturning long established precedent when it suits them.

I'm also not convinced that red flag laws can't work. They just have to be designed with a ton of safeguards in place. I think we should at least try them before deciding that they can't work. I believe there are already a handful of them in place at the state level, but I could be wrong as I don't follow the issue closely.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 2 years ago

To be precise, we share a common monkey-like ancestor with monkeys, we didn't evolve from them.

I'll show myself out.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 7 points 2 years ago

Go home, you're drunk and babbling.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 2 years ago

Oh good, whataboutism! I was hoping someone would think to get into some whataboutism. A Russia-bashing thread is never complete without your whataboutism with regard to the US. It's axiomatic. You can't have one without the other.

view more: ‹ prev next ›