Yeah that's not the source, that's still output. You don't seem to understand how LLMs work and yet have taken a bizarre stance on it anyway.
TheOctonaut
How exactly do you expect to see the "source" of a language model?
.....
Hey does anyone want to buy a t-shirt from me with this guy's worst comments printed on it?
"I don't understand it because I don't believe in it"
— literally any hexbear user
It's not just any water, it's holy water. If a priest has cast Ceremony to create the holy water on whatever, sure. But why when you probably have liquid water tk hand? God might wonder if it's very sincere if you're just basically doing it for a laugh. Might take away your spell slots.
Do good people fuck Bob?
And like she told you, if you're the only one having fun you don't actually need to involve anyone else
Using a (half?) different "good thing, bad thing" meme template doesn't make this a new meme
It's a joke my friend. The FBI don't actually have a lemmy server
Inaction isn't action
Unless you're dead, choosing not to vote is an action. Don't deny your own agency.
Why do people believe this shit? Like the Internet was around. You can go see me arguing with people calling my Nokia NGage a taco and me defending having to hold it weird if I get to play Tomb Raider on my phone, on forums, right now. Oh and the kids all hold their phones that way now and yes it looks stupid but they just remastered Tomb Raider for mobile so who cares.
You know that's not the LLM's 'source' right? It's still output. Do you mean the training data? Is that what you mean by CoPilot should be open source? If CoPilot has learned from something GPL then everything else it outputs, or perhaps specifically its training data - should be GPL?