TheFogan

sounds to me just like googles bots are finding them... could also just be maybe chrome or similar taking note when it finds a page and dropping a dime to google.

I don't see why, least my understanding, you hit share chat, it creates a public link... google's robots discover everything public and index it. Seems to me like the same problem would happen if you generated a link to share on any platform, and burned it and never sent information to any platform. Unless googles indexing all whatsapp messages, but that would be a much bigger story.

Anyway point is blame IMO falls on either chatgpt for not properly configuring a robots.txt, or google for not following it.

New solution for jobs numbers... You run door dash and grubhub sometimes to subsidize your low wages at your main job, cool you count as 3 jobs. You gave your kid $5 allowance, that counts as him having a job. We can get those numbers up.

not sure if you are joking, but any valid IP4 address starting with 127. does the same thing, loopback. 127.0.0.1 is just the standard most people use, you could use 127.127.127.127, or 127.1.1.1 or any random numbers 0 and 254 for the second 2, and 1 and 254 for the last and the effects will be identical.

I mean I do have to say, they can stop you right? least if the company has any dress policy etc... they can request that the clown follow the companys dress policy when coming into the building... which if he complies I guess they can't stop you, but at that point I don't know if someone is technically a clown out of uniform.

I do wonder where the guy is now, as I'd be willing to bet his notoriety landed him some other job afterwards.

Well of course, how else would you trick script kiddies that figured out when they DDOSed 127.0.0.1 and learned what a loop back was, and get them again in a few weeks with "ok ok my real address is 127.34.21.2"

We need to respect the victims, that's why we can't release it.

Now watch the real thing be released full of victim names as he calls for harrasing them... but all the perpetrators names redacted.

really not sure of why it would be a thing for christian couples anyway. Nudity alone is a factor if they are not married. So, only benefit is if either they want different temperatures or apparently colors in the water.

2020 - Don't know how to code, just copy-paste from stack overflow.

2024 - Don't know how to code, just ask chatgpt and copy paste.

2025 - chatgpt's code isn't working, ask on stackoverflow.

Dunno, I know enough duplicate exploits in games to know giving the effect then reducing the item, is a pretty common source of duplication hacks/bugs.

I guess it comes down to which is the designer is more afraid of happening, the chance of a wish being expended but not granted, or granted without expending.

Then again based on disney's aladin, tricking the genie into rescuing him without using a wish, it does seem practical to assume that the genie errors on the side of granting without expending.

Wouldn't it depend on the order of operations, you'd think even vibe coding a genie would still have the sense to lower the counter before granting the wish.

So logically

Wishes = 3

Make wish count zero.

*wish used, wish count 2

Wish applied, wish count 0

Found the QA tester.