TheCleric

joined 1 month ago
[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, praising ignorance is never that cool of a look

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 3 points 5 hours ago

Well, he is a super host.

Though I’m sure that didn’t weigh into their lenient decision at all no sir

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 3 points 5 hours ago (3 children)
[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 12 points 1 day ago

Oh my sweet summer child

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, I dunno. Pardons are good when the justice system fails and locks up innocent people for decades. The burden of proof on appeals is set so high that the appeals system is broken in and of itself. Think about all the racially motivated prosecutions throughout the years, the unjustly prosecuted anarchists, the bribed juries, the kangaroo court shenanigans, etc. How many stories have we heard of cops badgering the wrong person for dozens of hours in interrogation until they got false confessions? All because cops’ egos are so absurd that they refuse to admit they might have come to the wrong conclusions with incomplete information. I’m all for pardons in crimes against individuals. The problems isn’t in the case structure, it’s in the person doling out the pardons.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, but the question ultimately lies in how many bad and straight up harmful policies are worth the small step toward an egalitarian society? Where does it become ignoble to vote for one policy, when there are ultimately many more harmful ones outweighing the positive? Because it’s kinda rare that we get to vote on policy. We vote for people, with the vague promise of policy ideas that face an uphill battle and watering down— not to mention the straight up bastardization of those good policies, turning them into terrible ones.

I wish it were so black and white as us getting to vote on policy. The policymakers surely seem to be unable.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. He’s even trying empathy and basic humanity as means to change the topic

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, what’s your definition of “safe?” There are benefits and drawbacks to every form of currency. Credit is centralized and benefits massive pieces of shit and requires computing power. Cash is untraceable, and it doesn’t fund anything in particular (minus the federal reserve, but that’s a huge complicated stupid convo), but if you lose it or get it stolen, you can’t file a complaint and get it credited back to you.

I’ve used cash over the internet. It’s a matter of mailing it and getting a product in return. Or you can use the apps that aren’t linked to visa and PayPal. But it’s all a trade off, for sure.

Also, we need to stop thinking of shopping on the Internet as the only way to get products for money. Buy local every opportunity you can, that’s the best answer

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the character never held a switchblade to a child, that is a modern satire of the old campaign, especially popular among electricians

view more: next ›