TheAlbatross

joined 2 years ago
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kinda weird day to announce this

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

80°F by 7:30 A.M. and humid enough to drink. Feels like a hellish car for sure.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Trump is still over a million people under Barrack's deportation record. It's a vile machine that hasn't stopped or faltered regardless of which party rules.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think it's nigh impossible to come up with strict rules about these things.

I also think it's fine that women have spaces that are just for them.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 1 month ago (11 children)

We live in a gerontocracy, of course our leaders are going to be suffering from cognitive decline.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bro's just mad that Trump is gunning to beat his deportation numbers, but no worries Barrack you still have the lead by over a million.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's utterly baffling that the dnc isn't as obstructionist as the rnc if they truly hold the ideals they claim to

I'm in a SFH but all the bathrooms are very proximal to the heater so it slaps

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 78 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I'm so thrown off by our current shower which legit heats up in 2 seconds. I was so used to waiting like a minute for it to warm up, I built my rituals around that. But this one... it's just hot, like right away. Bizarre

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

What's with the hostility here?

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey I'm actually baffled by your reply. You clearly didn't know there were 5 actors who played Alexander, because if you did, you'd know they were mostly one offs, from a different series at a different age or, uh, a photograph. It's like you saw my comment, decided to reply to it, searched "Star Trek Alexander actor" and read the headline of the first result, a Screen Rant article titled "Star Trek: All 5 Actors Who Played Worf's Son, Alexander", and decided "That's enough info, I'm ready to reply to that comment."

Clearly you didn't read the article, otherwise you wouldn't reply the way you did, because you'd know why there's 5 Alexander's and it wasn't because the writers were trying to fix the issue.

I'm not mad or annoyed or anything, I'm just utterly baffled by how you use the internet.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's.. not quite right. Did you get this from skimming Wikipedia? It's true that the first TNG ep featuring Alexander had someone other than Bonsall play the role, that kid stopped acting almost immediately after. Bonsall played Alexander for the rest of TNG. They age up Alexander significantly for his return in DS9, so, yeah, needs a different actor. There's a TNG ep where Alexander comes back from the future to try and correct what a shitty character they made, so that's probably your "fourth" Alexander and I'm not sure where the fifth comes from.

Edit: Looked that one up. The "Fifth Alexander" is a technicality. Worf has a picture of him and Alexander as one of his personal effects that he brings with him onto DS9 and the person in that picture "playing" Alexander is uncredited, but makes no other appearance other than being in that photo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›