Doubt there is any hole evading the porn industry.
There is probably some website dedicated to tiny holes near the ears.
Tetsuo
joined 2 years ago
That will be 40$.
X x
Also bugmenot.com is pretty handy sometimes.
Sadly, a lot of websites are blocking temporary email domains :(
I used jetable.org for years but now it's fairly commonly blocked in email forms.
This looks really cool !
Although I would be a bit concerned login in this website instead of your instance.
I think we should expect/aim to just have some "mass repost script" that can take an extract of a community's content and just "repost" it on a new community.
Basically, a script that would "replay" a community in one go. I don't know if you could create "new comments" that immitates perfectly the original commenter but that would be the idea for a quick and very dirty "community mover script".
A bit like in GIT when you want to change/remove a specific commit, you can only replay/rebuild everything from the start by creating new everything posts/comments.
Or maybe that's a terrible plan ;)
On a more technical level, it takes quite some ressources for a server to broadcast their communities to all other lemmy instances.
"Receiving" a remote community is just reading data and inserting it in your instance. But if a community is hosted on your instance, you have to send that data to each and every instances with at least one user subscribed to it.
So it's really better for everyone to spread out on as many instances as possible. The only thing I would recommend before setting up a community (or your user account) on an instance is to check if you align with their moderation rules/code of conduct.
Si tu utilises un débrideur comme ce tuto semble le faire, pour moi tu n'as pas besoin d'un VPN: HADOPI ne contrôle pas le téléchargement direct. Dans ce cas la partie P2P est faite par Real-Debrid dans un datacenter et tu n'es pas "exposé".
Je ne savais pas que cela existait.
Alors je ne pourrai en dire plus mais je serai un peu moins bête ce soir :)
Merci !
There isn't any audit on whatsapp's side. So you are trusting they are running the code they tell you they run on their servers.
So it's not just about metadata, I wouldn't trust facebook not to have some kind of access to the content of the messages. Which is much worse.
Also, Whatsapp is Facebook right ? Not really an amazing track record when it comes to privacy. They said they implemented the Signal protocol but you still have to trust them to be doing so.
I think that's what the person you are responding to was essentially saying, we do not know for sure what Whatsapp does.
Don't put your cat on that Roomba.