Tetsuo
So just like Reddit does if I'm not mistaken ?
EA ruin my favorite gaming franchise: Battlefield
Or DICE did under the supervision of the geniuses over at EA.
Now I will never get to play another Battlefield game...
So yeah, it's better to stay away from EA products.
C'est bien connu en France:
Il a été bercé trop près du mur.
SolidGoldMagikarp
Edit: Very obscure reference, sorry.
No, cat is beautiful from every angle.
I had multiple times experiences like that with American redditors.
They would say that socialism is nazism because National Socialism.
So yeah, didn't know really what to answer to such level of ignorance.
Considering the average quality of auto subtitles, this looks like feeding crap inputs to an already "unreliable" AI.
What I think is interesting is that we usually have pretty good scores in term of productivity despite having a lot of holidays and strikes.
If anything it should be a testament to the idea that it's ok to be against "too much work". It's not being lazy, it's understanding that you work better when you are properly rested.
At least that's the way I see it. Don't work more, work better.
Why look for conspiracy when stupidity can explain so much.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
If I'm not mistaken AI work was just recently considered as NOT copyrightable.
So I find interesting that an AI learning from copyrighted work is an issue even though what will be generated will NOT be copyrightable.
So even if you generated some copy of Harry Potter you would not be able to copyright it. So in no way could you really compete with the original art.
I'm not saying that it makes it ok to train AIs on copyrighted art but I think it's still an interesting aspect of this topic.
As others probably have stated, the AI may be creating content that is transformative and therefore under fair use. But even if that work is transformative it cannot be copyrighted because it wasn't created by a human.