It's still irrelevant but you have to be really dumb to agree to represent Trump as a lawyer..'
https://youtu.be/Lhy5Y8xVHS0?si=eTZrXuHCO_KdGL-5
I mean Rudy is still waiting to get paid for his lawyer fees by trump.
Tetsuo
joined 2 years ago
Are we tackling anything in the last decade ?
Do people look at the ever increasing graph of CO2 emissions worldwide ?
It increased last year. It will increase this year.
Let's do our best to delay it but it's happening people.
Our politics are all cowards no matter the country.
It was done in the past for larger US based businesses. I don't see why it couldn't be done with DDG.
Also, if your businesses is under a gag order the most logical thing to do is to act like nothing is happening. Because for DDG privacy IS the product. They don't have better results than Google they are trying to differentiate through privacy (or the appearance of privacy).
In France, I understood the fight against climate change is probably already over when we had 40°C at midnight one day of the previous summer.
It's an eary feeling to feel ultra hot air in the middle of the night coming from an opened window.
Not saying I'm not trying to act against climate change on my level but I know we already lost.
Also DDG is US based and has to submit to all the privacy invading American agencies. And they could be under a gag order nobody would ever know.
If privacy was a genuine concern for DDG they would have never based their business in the US.
You can create an account on DDG.
Even if you don't they can probably link your IP to search requests.
And even if they refuse, some agency could probably install their own software to track users.
I understand this looks like paranoia but again considering the invasion of privacy the NSA did in the past, it's not really far fetched.
My only concern with DDG is that they are US based and as far as I know they can be submitted to a gag order and forced to silently give private data to some agencies.
After the Snowden leaks this doesn't inspire much confidence in their ability to protect the privacy of their users.
I think they simply can't guarantee any privacy even if they have good intentions.
This cat looks pissed to me.
Or just an unlucky pic with his ears to the back.
Weren't they talking about adding ADs right in VR ?
Seriously, what a nightmare. You try to escape reality playing a video game in immersion through VR and you get served ads ?
That added to privacy issues at Facebook, I would never touch that product.
Can you store emojis in KeePass ? 🤔
Just to get this straight, in Germany if coca cola sells a can of coke to a consumer and that it is somehow returned to them through a deposit scheme or something they are legally bound to recycle entirely that aluminium foil ?
If that's the case that's amazing but in many countries in Europe a lot of effort is done to collect recyclable stuff but that certainly does not mean it will be recycled.
There is a vast difference between something being mandatory to put in the recycling bin and it actually being recycled for real.
Je dirais juste :
Cheh