Were they ever solved?
Tenderizer
joined 3 months ago
Perhaps these kinds of degrees should require work experience (or a disability) as a prerequisite. If they're using taxpayer dollars to get a degree they don't need, they should prove they would have the social and adulting skills to be employable in the fields in question.
There's a legitimate argument to be had about privacy vs. safety. The police need information to investigate crimes, complete privacy means all crimes go unsolved. It should absolutely require the police put in some legwork, law enforcement shouldn't be able to be automated, but where in-between the two extremes you draw the line on this issue is subjective.
I don't want the government to have all the information, and I do want the government to be able to enforce the law. VPN's are probably where I draw the line, private access to information is a red-line for me. Signal chat is a grey area for me, because it is also a means of accessing information but privacy of association is not something I consider to be important enough for the risks to public safety.
I'd just ban the algorithm and comments section of YouTube. Because kids are 100% gonna get a VPN to access YouTube or die trying.
To confirm, are strip searches required to be done by the same gender?
What is this obsession with HECS debt. We're not America, our student debt system is extremely reasonable and of basically no concern. The only reason it ever causes problems is because our housing market is an absolute nightmare but that's true for everyone HECS debt or not.
I read that title as "facial transplant".
I will be taking no further questions.
The electricity grid may not yet be able to handle the sudden influx in demand that replacing them would cause. Once electricity prices come down due to renewables naturally it would make no economic sense to use a wood-heater anyway.
YouTube makes last-ditch attempt to lobby government against inclusion in under-16s social media ban
I just want existing accounts grandfathered in. These kinds of bans are more effective at reducing uptake than getting people off the platforms, and more importantly I don't want to do more paperwork.
I can't find my source for the fact that existing accounts won't be grandfathered in.
He did not view Israel as a foreign government
Totally reasonable I guess. Israel owns America, and America owns us. Wild to think that's okay though even if it is technically reasonable.
The names of the Members who are in the minority shall be recorded in the Votes and Proceedings.
Given the amount people are up in arms, you'd assume they're hiding who those 6 people are entirely (and even if they were, it'll really only benefit fringe mp's like the Greens). Sure, it lumps the yes votes with non-attendance but if the vote is overwhelming I don't think a few people not showing up is of much concern to the public interest. Plus the crossbench is well over 6 people so if it's just the major parties this won't even trigger.
view more: next ›
Higher than I thought honestly. I thought it was like 1/4 murders that were solved.