Libs really need to understand what messages only serve to virtue signal to their in group versus convince a neutral bystander. This type of smug self-congratulatory horseshit is less convincing to the average normie scrolling by than posting that Tom Hanks is going to harvest their kid's andrenochrome. And this stuff makes the chuds gleeful because it reads like you are coping by unraveling.
TemutheeChallahmet
Not only is Kamala sauceless but a ton of black people under 40 do not consider her black
Holland Taylor is a pretty well-known theatre actress who is dating Sarah Paulson, 32 years her junior
I was more referring to the out of sight, out of mind approach to intra party criticism of Biden's mental acuity, which manifested in a concerted effort to attack Castro for inappropriate ageism even though there was a kernel of truth to what he said.
Shakespeare was even called this by a contemporary theatre critic
All people at least sympathetic to the thrust of woke/DEI stuff should proudly tout it and own it by name. The left and liberals have a terrible fear of seeming cringe that keeps them from being unyielding and unironic in championing what they supposedly support, lest they are accused of "identity politics" and virtue signaling--allowing a new wave of dogwhistles to rise, bigots to run amok spreading their hatred.
I think they were portraying Che as he existed on a t-shirt rather than in history
More likely explanation is that "he had great ideas but did them the wrong way" is the leftmost message the lib writer could conceive of making about Che
You mean that weird Aella girl or do you mean Buck Angel
Sir this is a Lendy's