TehPers

If you were previously only attracted to women, do you now consider yourself bi or pan or something else, or is it just an attraction for your husband?

Only really him, though I don't categorize myself as anything (bi, pan, straight, whatever). My only real concern is whether I find who I'm with to be attractive, and the answer to that is yes. I guess that'd make me pan?

If it's an only him thing does he feel some way about that?

As far as I'm aware, not really, but I'd have to ask. He does find my attraction to him to be important, but hasn't mentioned anything beyond that to me (maybe to his therapist but I don't want to ask him too much about that).

Been on the other side (spouse is ftm). As someone in a similar position who was not really interested in men (but now very much so to my husband), keep in mind that she does not need to be attracted to all women, just you.

My recommendation for an easy place to start, for both of you, is for you to dress up around her. Put on a dress and makeup, or some other feminine outfit (however it is you want to dress, whatever makes you feel pretty). Try to look how you want to. See if she's still attracted to you. When you're both comfortable, take it to the bedroom, and give it a shot. If she's still enjoying it, then that's what's important!

Physical transitions don't happen overnight, and I was able to get used to the changes as they happened. I still see the same person I saw when we first got together, and even though there are some physical differences, he's the same person he's always been.

The hardest part for me was the social aspect, not the attraction. While I could try to give suggestions here, if this is a struggle for you or her, seriously seek a therapist. This isn't something that's easy to overcome, and it will take time.

Good luck!

Shortly after the ruling, an AP reporter and photographer were turned away from joining a motorcade with the White House press pool to cover Trump’s appearance before the National Republican Congressional Committee.

They've been ignoring the law since when the elections began. They're not going to start following it now.

This is even more concerning. While I'm not a fan of energy drinks, I don't think people drinking them should become unknowingly inebriated. There's also people who avoid alcohol for religious reasons, health reasons, etc.

This fuck up was pretty unacceptable.

And if the state tells the federal government to go fuck itself?

The Guardian reviewed training materials developed by the JUF [Jewish United Federation] and the Anti-Defamation League, which both push pro-Israel agendas in the US, and found the overarching message is that criticism of Israel or Zionism is antisemitic.

Who could have possibly guessed this would happen?

Am I missing something here? The article talks only about how user data was exposed, including the data on men being discussed in private messages. I don't see any mention about any of what's being discussed in these comments.

I get that there's probably some talking behind backs or whatever going on in the app, but both criticism and defense of it seems completely irrelevant to the article in question.

If anything, the article goes to show just how wide of an impact the breach has. It not only is a violation of the users privacy (again), but also of personal information of non-users, including relationship history and sexual preferences of both the women on the app and the men they're discussing.

Sometimes I wonder what the gender field is even for anymore. In this case, it's clearly there just so you can select that option.

As an aside, a website I used to use decades ago had a relatively harmless vulnerability in its "sex" field in the profile editor, allowing you to submit any value you want, and the website would render what you submitted. The field was also specifically called "sex", not "gender". You can imagine what values people put there.

Maybe we can get the people pushing for this to give the chairs a test run to make sure they still work?

And the world is round.

At this point, regardless of which ~~football team~~ party you root for, if you thought otherwise, consider moving out of the rock you've been living under.

Imagine if it were Nintendo suing over IP infringement.

Anyway, it's Roblox and Discord. Both platforms have a history of stuff like this. It's sad how prevalent it is, and I have to wonder how many people are out there setting up these environments just to target children.

While I agree the term "windmill" makes no sense, this is unfortunately a losing battle.