TWeaK

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ohh, that actually looks like it might be worth watching. I got fed up with anime and all its tropes - particularly everything being set in high school.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Salvatore Ganacci is a don! Watching this time I only just noticed his shoe car in the background on top of one of the buildings.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They still have the right to distribute it. It's not like reddit, who not only claim the right but also apparently claim ownership of any content you publish there, while providing no consideration (payment) in return.

However, as you say, they have the right to deny you, and by copying you are subverting their rights. That's still not theft, though, which is why copyright infringement is a separate offense.

Theft is a crime, copyright infringement is a civil matter.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Depends on how you define stealing.

Stealing is theft, or in US law larceny, which is very clearly defined. Copying does not meet this definition, hence why copyright infringement is a separate offense.

Theft is a crime, copyright infringement is a civil offense (except commercial copyright infringement, which can be reached if the value exceeds $1,000 - lobbyists worked hard to criminalise what normal citizens were doing and had success in this point, while they still get away with fleecing everyone, both artists and end users).

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

For a moment there I thought that was from this music video

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It was all about the dog anyway XD

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean Google are literally the reason recipes have to have a big waffley story instead of getting straight to the point.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

the one with the most ability to act on his own

Maybe 3 years ago he would've been, but right now, with an election coming up against Trump and his Maggats, he's in a very precarious position.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But that's the AI's fault, definitely not Google's, who built and designed the AI.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

He's the leader of the party, but this had bipartisan support.

I'm not saying he's not responsible, just that they all are. Also he has to be careful with it being election year and being up against Trump.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's definitely culpable, but he's far from the only one.

view more: ‹ prev next ›