Put him in jail already.
That is not the case for all HOA’s. For some, they have gated communities.
Yes, but they still allow mail deliveries and visitors in some form or another.
After all, they aren’t building these amenities for everyone to use, just residents who either own property or are leasing property in a way that is approved by the HOA.
Yes, but there are other ways to manage that then setting up an HOA which can be expanded well beyond the management of that communal property.
You only have to look and see how other countries do it to see that HOA's are uniquely an American problem, one that has no justification in being as bad as it is.
Were they even protesting about Palestine?
Sure, but what's wrong with that? I mean, roads are already open to everyone - your mailman can access them, visitors can access them, etc. If you extend it to ponds and parks and stuff, it wouldn't be the end of the world for those to be public, either.
Maybe with pools and such it's a different story, but there are ways of managing those without setting up a mini government rife for abuse.
“Stripped of their rights” implies all rights.
No, it doesn't. You can lost rights without losing all your rights. All it implies is that more than 1 right was removed, and that it was done so unwillingly.
If you can’t see the difference, then you’re unknowingly part of the misinformation.
Please back this statement up with some sound reasoning.
It seems more likely that you are stubbornly refusing to admit you were wrong about something very minor.
So we should say all Americans have been stripped of their rights, because women cannot access life-saving medical care in the event of a complication of a late-term pregnancy?
We can say that all American cis women have been stripped of their rights, yes. However more accurately this would be on a state by state basis.
We are arguing semantics, but you're the one justifying a sensationalist response to an accurate statement.
I think you are misunderstanding, "stripped of their rights" does not necessarily mean they lose all rights, or certain rights in particular, it simply that they lose some rights. They lost some rights, therefore they have been stripped of their rights.
You're basically saying "those aren't the rights I was talking about".
They do not have the right to self-determination since 2018, thus they do not have the same rights. Several of the rights of non-Jews were stripped away with the 2018 law. Not all of them, but some very significant ones.
They have similar rights, and share many of the same rights, but Jewish people have more rights than non-Jews in Israel. Not just in practice, but per the law.
That's a very long-winded way of saying Trump is in Russia's pocket and didn't like Biden's interference in Russian-driven corruption in Ukraine ahead of their invasion.
Europe’s global plans all require money ~~no one has~~ hoarded by the wealthy elite that no one is willing to properly tax and collect
FTFY
Please provide a definition or rationalisation that supports your position. I've looked myself, and all the ones I've found make no mention of "all" rights being removed. Here's one: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/strip-of
I think you don't know what else to say because you are wrong and have nothing to support your position. It is you who clearly doesn't understand, but I think that's more stubbornness than anything else.