Have you got any pictures of other hits to compare it to?
No, he means generally. His opinion is that Israel is the most likely culprit, but he does not give that as a certainty.
I'm not shifting any goalposts, I'm coming at you with rational reasoning.
It hasn't been verified by MSF, it's been repeated by a single doctor.
I was repeating a question your previous reply did not answer.
I have already addressed the 500+ claim as highly suspicious, given that it was stated almost immediately after the attack. You have not addressed the nature of the explosion not lining up with JDAMs.
One of the most recent comments from that same guy:
Information is still emerging. At this stage, I would refrain from drawing any conclusion with 100% certainty.
You seem awfully certain.
then how come there was no significant damage to any of the buildings and no crater?
Yep, there's evidence of Israelis doing dodgy shit and coming up with excuses all over. So it wouldn't be surprising if it was an Israeli attack - but that alone doesn't mean that it is.
What exactly is the evidence that it isn’t a JDAM? The lack of casualties?
Mainly the lack of damage to anything, the nature of the explosion. JDAM's from high up leave a big crater - there is none, nor is there significant damge to buildings. This projectile seemed to be travelling horizontally, as if it misfired in the wrong direction.
It looks as if it hit some cars and the conflaguration was caused by fuel burning.
Link?
Doctors can be just as prone to parroting numbers they've heard without checking as anyone else.
I don't believe Israel in any of this. I believe the abundance of evidence online analysed by geeky people who know their shit.
I don't know who fired it, it could be Israel, but all the evidence available points to it not being a JDAM at it being something fired from within Palestine. If there is evidence to the contrary then I might change my mind, but so far I haven't come across it, and you're just posting in anger so it's not like you've got much credibility.
500+ dead was quoted instantly, they haven't counted.
This almost certainly isn't a JDAM.
Net work is supposed to be net, ie including debts.