TWeaK

Archive.org is the OG, run by Internet Archives. However the downside is that you can't just make up a link - with archive.is you can just append the URL you want and it will work (eventually, once it's actually done its archiving) but with archive.org you have to actually go to the site and paste the URL, then you'll see all the snapshots it has and each link has the date and time of the snapshot.

If archive.org could do something to make it easier to make links that would be perfect.

On my phone it usually works, so long as I have Private DNS settings off, even through my home network using my router's DNS settings. If I turn on the Private DNS on my phone it won't load.

On my PC's it's blocked every time at home. This is using my router's DNS, I don't have it configured locally, so if I hop onto a WiFi with standard DNS it should work.

When I looked into it before I found a reddit post that mentioned it was because they actively sabotage DNS queries from Cloudflare and Quad9. Someone made a workaround but I CBA doing that, I prefer his middle finger solution (advocating for archive.org instead). https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/118haqg/archiveph_webpage_archive_as_site_is/

archive.today and all its subsidiaries are hit and miss for me. They poison DNS and half my devices won't load their pages.

Their argument is that the copying to their training database is "research". This would be a legal fair use of unauthorised copying. However, normally with research you make a prototype, and that prototype is distinctly different from the final commercial product. With LLM's the prototype is the finished commercial product, they keep adding to it, thus it isn't normal fair use.

When a court considers fair use, the first step is the type of use. The exemptions are education, research, news, comment, or criticism. Next, they consider the nature of the use, in particular whether it is commercial. Calling their copying "research" is a bit of a stretch - it's not like they're writing academic papers and making their data publicly available for review from other scientists - and their use is absolutely commercial. However, it needs to go before a judge to make the decision and it's very difficult for someone to show a cause of action, if only because all their copying is done secretly behind closed doors.

The output of the AI itself is a bit more difficult. The database ChatGPT runs off of does not include the whole works it learned from - it's in the training database where all the copying occurs. However, ChatGPT and other LLM's can sometimes still manage to reproduce the original works, and arguably this should be an offense. If a human being reads a book and then later writes a story that replicates significant parts of the book, then they would be guilty of plagiarism and copyright infringement, regardless of whether they genuinely believe they were coming up with original ideas.

OpenAI isn't really proven as legal. They claim it is, and it's very difficult to mount a challenge, but there definitely is an argument that they have no fair use protection - their "research" is in fact development of a commercial product.

I wouldn't be so smug, this just means they feel so secure in their position (via gerrymandering and the like) that they don't feel like they need to spend more.

I wonder why it's a "safely Republican" district?

Battle flag, war banner, same difference.

Although I'm sure CGPGrey would chew me out just as much if not more than you have.

Doesn't seem like that high of a record.

The Confederate flag isn't even a flag, it's a war banner.

To be clear, Noel Thomas was only sentenced to 9 months and served it in full. He wasn't exonerated until much later. Many convicted sub-postmasters died before their convictions could be overturned, and most of them are still waiting to get back the thousands they paid to pad the post office's profits.

Paywal.