TWeaK

That's what I don't get: If we make it better for women to have sex with men, they'll have more sex with men, right? Like, if they knew they wouldn't have an unexpected pregnancy but would have an orgasm they'd probably be more open to it with more men, right? If they had a reasonable expectation that his place would be clean, he would be clean, and he'd take "No" for an answer, they'd be less apprehensive.

I don't understand why more cishet men don't get this.

Lol, they still haven't fixed the bug that lets you view deleted comments from 3rd party apps.

Ohh yeah, that reminds me, on Jerboa I was able to view other peoples' deleted comments somehow since the 0.19.1 update. That was kinda fun - I wonder if they fixed that in 0.19.2?

But yeah the upvote/downvote of deleted comments thing was actually a bug fix. Before 0.19.1, deleted comments would take out the entire tree - you couldn't really see the rest of the comments beneath it unless you came at one of them with a direct link. They fixed that, but at the same time left a bit of a hole in the API.

I've also seen an occasion where moderation action on another instance hadn't quite federated through everywhere. And I know for a fact my instance does not run pure lemmy code - not that I see it as a bad thing, our admin really knows his stuff and makes things more robust. When shit has hit the fan with other instances, he was front and centre helping them, while his instance was immune before it even happened.

Edit: They haven't fixed that bug: https://lemm.ee/comment/8151715

Incidentally, I find it really annoying that you can't make an instance agnostic link to a post or comment. Every instance just gives each one a number, but the different numbers across each instance. You can type /u/tweak@lemm.ee and it should make a link that anyone can click in their own instance, but you can't do the same with posts or comments.

I'm not getting my hopes up, but there are good signs for this movie.

You show me where in the legislation it says commerciality determines whether or not copyright has occurred. It does not.

In fact, why don't you provide the specific case you're referring to? All we have is your third hand interpretation.

Because you might not want to visit another instance - the instance you register with is the one you trust with your traffic. Who knows whether the other instance is running pure lemmy or is compromised somehow with alternate code. Also, you're simply not logged in to that instance, so you can't interact with the post there. And there's the fact that linking to a post and not an image doesn't let you expand the image in situ.

He isn't. However, you can still make something from a loss - such as establishing new standards of what social media websites can get away with.

See, to me, it's absolutely fine. If you're having a conversation with me, you have no expectation of privacy against me, and me making an audio recording is no different to me getting out a pen and paper and making a written record of what we say - the only difference being an audio recording is less fallible.

Now, publishing that recording is another matter, and might be some sort of offence. The recording can only be for personal use. For courts in the UK, the way it is handled is that you simply write a transcript of the recording and submit that as a statement in evidence - this way, the court doesn't waste their time bickering over the sound of a word on the recording, and instead maintains its position of deciding an argument between two parties, and the added advantage is that the other party doesn't even get to listen to the recording itself.

OIL shipping lines o7

There could've been a good Frodo joke here somewhere, but instead we get.. this...

He let her have the braincell.

We all could do with less salt in our lives.

Being a woman and having sex is apparently a crime.

Any yet, at the same time, this will only create more Andy Tater-tots pissed off that they can't get laid.