Young people are generally far less likely to vote, so which way they vote is somewhat irrelevant.
What's the last thing to go through a fly's mind as it hits the windshield?
It's ass.
Glad to see there's someone trying to make the process more legitimate.
However, I feel like the better solution is to require that all raw data be publicly available - no one pays for it, but everyone can access it. Then, when people process the data, they can keep their methods and results secret. I think this is perhaps a more practical solution as the cat is already out of the bag, you're not going to get the likes of Facebook paying users appropriately.
If the phone app doesn't have call recording, I'm not interested. SimpleMobileTools were nice, I'm glad that they're still continuing on in spirit through a fork, but there are plenty of FOSS apps to choose from - pick the ones you like most.
Saying that though I understand the appeal of having a set of apps that look the same.
Nancy needs to shut the fuck up and stop trying to give Trump the election.
Most people not caring isn't a concern of mine. Apple being wealthy isn't a concern of mine. What concerns me is that the products I use flourish and develop in ways that I like. I don't use Apple, so I don't particularly care about them - I just watch the drama from the sidelines.
You're not bursting my bubble in any way, but you are being a little pretentious.
particularly by uniting Catholics and Evangelicals who previously didn’t really get along.
The birth of abortion as a wedge issue is a particularly strange one. It started with a wannabe Hollywood filmmaker, Frank Schaeffer, who made a video for Evangelicals with his father, which included a scene on abortion. For his next movie/series, he made it solely about abortions, and Evangelicals were like "That's a Catholic issue, we're not Catholic." and didn't come to see it. Then, the New York Post made an article on this weird avant garde anti-abortion movie, and radical feminists started protesting outside his movies - previously, they had been held in stadiums but were almost completely empty. The Evangelicals basically went "Well, if they're against it, we should be for it!" and started filling out the stadiums and adopting an anti-abortion stance.
Frank Schaeffer has since regretted his decision. At the time he was a new father, having accidently gotten his girlfriend/wife pregnant, and that was the source of his anti-abortion sentiment. These days he speaks out against the anti-abortion movement and the religious far-right.
There's a really good BBC podcast/radio show that goes through all of it, and even interviews Schaeffer himself. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0011cpq
Weirdly, Frank Schaeffer's Wikipedia page doesn't even really cover the anti-abortion video or the influence it had, it just casually mentions that he met with Reagan and others, as well as helping write one of Reagan's books.
This isn't even just about abortion anymore, it's about the sanctity of the democratic process.
It also feels like these states are good examples of the value of direct democracy. I think we should have more of that. Our representatives don't actually represent us, so we should fire them and let us have our own say.
Sure, that's never going. Why would we want to lose our technological connection to Abraham Lincoln and samurai?
We need as much relevant oglaf as there are relevant xkcd's.
I agree with the top comment highlighting PCOS and trans men and women. It's a somewhat narrow view, but a valid comment.
The thing I took issue with was the claim that the article didn't say the very thing it says in the abstract.
The paper is actually very, very good, in my opinion. It starts from the observed premise that "women are less sensitive to anesthetic than men" and then digs in to find out why, building significantly on previous research. Also, the error bars on their graphs are so tight they're sexy.
That's what I always use.
I think in some regions it's illegal to even have the function to record, as such many apps shy away from it.