I mean, it's clearly a joke. Not everything needs a /s tag.
Oh wait, I'm talking to Americans...
AI is a tool. Just like all tools, it's only as good as the tool that's using it.
Medicine relies on verification. AI operates without that.
AI would be terrible in medicine.
The Gospel is a good example, although I'd argue it's intentionally used for that purpose - that, and so that no person can be held to account for their decisions.
Segregation of church and state.. If anyone's not fit for office, it's him.
Pff, article author just doesn't know avant garde.
It wasn't the criticism of Russia that's leading to this, it's playing without a licence. It's somewhat similar to the classic "if you're going to break the law, only break one at a time".
Exactly, but that standard makes me even more curious what they actually said!
But what were the arguments??
But what were the arguments presented to the court??
This will indeed be an interesting test. I'm sure Thailand doesn't want to piss off Russia, not when Russian tourists have been boosting their economy recently. However their human rights obligations should trump that.
a new authority is codified into law that requires Border Patrol to immediately remove illegal immigrants they catch without processing. They would not get to request asylum, they would immediately be removed.
So in other words they want to make a law that completely violates international law the US was a part of writing.
/s, in case it wasn't obvious..