TGRush

joined 2 years ago
[–] TGRush@forum.fail 9 points 2 years ago

Even if they are coming, I don‘t think any of us which are already here will switch back. They should‘ve thought of this before they broke their platform.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 2 points 2 years ago

We can already view PeerTube channels in the "Microblogging" tab, as that's the way PeerTube federates to other services.

At least in theory that should be the case

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 2 points 2 years ago

I still prefer PeerTube.

(it's part of the Fediverse. We're also part of the Fediverse here on Kbin and Lemmy.)

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

NixOS can become quite complex, so maybe stay away from it until you know more about how to manage your system ;)

The other options you've mentioned here are good, but EndeavourOS is based on Arch, so that may be contradictory to what you've said earlier.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 1 points 2 years ago

It isn't just a fork, its a collection of tools and patches around wine tailored for a specific purpose.

DXVK, VKD3D and other components aren't part of Wine or Proton's Wine builds, for example. They're extra tools used on-top of Wine.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't really see Fedora maintainting a patched version of audacity as a fault of Flatpak, though.

Flathub is designed to allow developers to publish their own software in the way they intended. So Flathub and Flatpak are doing exactly what they're designed to do

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 1 points 2 years ago

Let's paraphrase to "CLI applications are quite cumbersome to use under Flatpak as per the current implementation".

Unless you set up your own aliases, you'll have to write out commands like flatpak run ..., and if you don't know the package name yet you'll need to run flatpak list --app first as well

I hope that in the future, Flatpak gets some improvements for exporting CLI utilities into the user's environment.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 1 points 2 years ago

Users upping permissions is not something that Flatpak is to blame for.

Flatpak has set the groundwork for sandboxing of desktop apps with a runtime permission system. People dont yet know how to properly use it.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The problem here is that most packages aren't maintained by developers, but rather by independent package maintainers from respective distributions.

In my eyes, this adds another potential point of failure outside the control of the developer of a given tool.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you so much for the consideration! <3

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This wouldn't work for the actual content however, as those are posted by individual users from all around the fediverse.

Exporting settings, moderators and alike might be feasible, though.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your best bet right now is blocking the biggest NSFW instance, lemmynsfw.com

view more: next ›