T00l_shed

joined 2 years ago
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I know, by itself it's insufficient, it is a step in the right direction though, albeit a small one

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (5 children)

About fucking time

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What a fucking loser.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The smell must have been divine. I love the smell of old books

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Thank you very much!

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Sorry if I missed it, but can you use "Google maps" or equivalent? I want to reduce my phone usage and having a simpler phone should help.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Affordable absolutely can be worse, see slum lords. Not flawed in the slightest. Yes landlords are leeches, they are providing a "service" that wouldn't need to exist if it weren't for them. Your mental gymnastics are why you don't understand what logic or empirical data is, lol. Good luck to you too!

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"Free" market demand is instinctly pro landlord, the people who own get to set prices and work to price others out. It's only superior for the societal leaches that are landlords. People were moving to ab more sure, but it's not solely due to rent. The data dies not prove your point, they will absolutely move to ab for worse housing conditions if that's all they can afford. Your logic is flawed

view more: next ›