Szymon

joined 2 years ago
[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

You see it the way you want dude

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ahh, thank you for explaining - it's the same way Hitler is inside you.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

If they can shoot a thin object in space on a ballistic trajectory, why can't they hit a single Hamas terrorist stationary on the ground without using less than 10 cruise missiles that instead wipe out the house and family of tv journalist that lives 10km away?

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

Wtf, that wasn't a strategically vital daycare like cruise missiles are supposed to be aimed at.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You may already be aware, but apples don't grow true to seed, so the tree growing from the seeds of an apple won't produce apples that taste the same.

Good tasting apples are rare genetic freaks, so the tree making them has a branch cut off and grafted onto a other tree.

Apples trees planted from seed will give you a crab apple, unless you're uniquely lucky. If you're looking for crab apples though, you're all set!

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A very small number of billionaires are hoarding money and buying politicians so that many more people have nothing anymore, yet they still want things like food, clothes, and entertainment in a system that denies it to them. The corporations setting the prices are required to generate profit for the shake holder, not create value for the customer or employee, so you have an environment where front line staff are considered cheap and expendable enough to be put in harms way when theft occurs for the sake of the bottom line because rules and laws about employee safety were removed by purchased politicians.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Got any sources on that one?

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So which free streaming service allowing for profit sharing on ad revenue which has essentially become the only name brand in the industry have you chosen to move to?

Or is your choice that you have to go without something you want because you disagree with the one single service offering it? Oh by the way, that company got that way through anti competitive practices to make sure that only they were able to operate this type of service.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

I think we're seeing people getting pissed about innocent people dying everywhere, and leaders are tripping over themselves justifying it for those they're allied with.

What does Israel have that requires the western countries to look the other way at this shit when they're appearing to stand up against it elsewhere.

I don't think the West is standing up against it anywhere, it's just a convenient political rally cry for whatever agenda you have and people will continue to die.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

If you can keep someone from dying by being dependent on only your medication, you've created a customer for life rather than one who died and didn't give you all their money to live another day.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

I considered one briefly but don't want the chance that Winnie The Pooh gets all my keystrokes.

I've had Chinese coworkers with them, but haven't seen one otherwise. That being said, I don't around discussing phone choices with people as a regular thing.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

They're just pieces of shit, that's all.

view more: ‹ prev next ›